Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37967282›Full record

Observational studyDeutsches Arzteblatt international2024

Cannabis Use in Germany.

Daniel Kotz, Sabrina Kastaun, Jakob Manthey, Eva Hoch, Stephanie Klosterhalfen

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Article
  11. Cannabis Consumption Rates were Underestimated.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniel KotzInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf; Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK; Institute of General Practice (ifam), Patient-Physician Communication Research Unit, Centre for Health and Society (chs), Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf; Center for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE); Department of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig; IFT Institut für Therapieforschung, Center for Mental Health and Addiction Research, Munich; Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment, Ludwig-Maximilans-Universität München, Munich; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Cannabinoid Research Group, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich.
Sabrina Kastaun
Jakob Manthey
Eva Hoch
Stephanie Klosterhalfen
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe federal government of Germany is planning to liberalize the recreational cannabis market for adults. We aimed to collect key baseline data on frequency of use, routes of administration, and co-use of cannabis and inhaled nicotine or tobacco products in the population.

methodsBased on data from a national survey of 9644 people aged >14 years, we analyzed self-reported use of cannabis in the past 12 months and preferred route of administration (single choice: smoked with tobacco; smoked without tobacco; inhaled without tobacco; consumed with food; consumed in another form).

resultsThe prevalence of past-year cannabis use was 4.6% (95% CI [4,2; 5,1%]), with higher rates among 14-24- (11.4%) and 25-39-year-olds (8.2%) as well as among co-users of inhaled nicotine or tobacco products, particularly waterpipe users (27.0%). Smoking cannabis with or without tobacco was the preferred route of administration, reported by 92.4% (95% CI [89,6; 94,6%]). It was most frequently reported by 14-24-year-olds and by co-users of inhaled nicotine or tobacco products.

conclusionSmoking remains the predominant form of using cannabis-especially among younger users, who are at greatest risk of cannabis-related consequences. The true prevalence of cannabis use may have been underestimated in our study, however, as not all participants answered the questions on cannabis. Nevertheless, preventive and harm reduction efforts are needed to reduce the harm from using cannabis. Continuous monitoring is required to evaluate the effects of the forthcoming law changes in Germany.

Indexed as

CannabisAdultGermanyHumansNicotineSelf ReportSmokingNicotine

Identifiers

PMID37967282
PMCPMC10979436
OpenAlexW4388737166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.