Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37967233›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2023

Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities of skin mechanical properties measured in healthy individuals using skin elasticity meter.

Yudai Fujimoto, Yoshimi Yuri, Yuji Kato, Shota Kinoshita, Hironari Tamiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Skin mechanical properties measured with skin elasticity measurement device in patients with lymphedema: Scoping review.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yudai FujimotoGraduate School of Health Sciences, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshimi YuriGraduate School of Health Sciences, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5963-8119
Yuji KatoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Shota KinoshitaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Hironari TamiyaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-8047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to establish a standardized measurement method and to examine the intra- and inter-reliabilities and absolute reliability of measuring skin mechanical properties using a skin elasticity meter (Cutometer®).

methodsTen healthy participated in the study. Skin mechanical properties were measured at four sites: upper arm, lower arm, upper leg and lower leg on both sides in supine position using a non-invasive skin elasticity meter by two trained different raters. The measurements include quantitative indices of the maximal distensibility (R0), elasticity (R2, R5, R7), and viscoelasticity (R6). Intra- and inter- relative reliabilities were determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1,1) and ICC (2,1) methods, respectively. The absolute reliability was assessed via the Bland-Altman analysis. Moreover, we evaluated the minimal detectable change at a 95% confidence level (MDC95).

resultsAt each site, the ICC (1,1) values were >0.90, and the ICC (2,1) values were >0.50. The Bland-Altman analysis did not reveal any fixed errors, and several sites and parameters have proportional errors.

conclusionsIn this study, intra- and inter-reliabilities were measured at "excellent" and more than "moderate" levels, respectively. However, because some proportional errors were observed, the limits of reliability agreement should be considered when using the proposed methods. We believe that the results of this study can be applied to clinical research in field of rehabilitation treatment.

Indexed as

SkinElasticityHumansReproducibility of ResultsBland–Altman analysismeasurementoutcomesreliabilitySkin elasticity meterskin mechanical properties

Identifiers

PMID37967233
PMCPMC10653741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.