Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37967216›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

rDNA magnification is a unique feature of germline stem cells.

Jonathan O Nelson, Tomohiro Kumon, Yukiko M Yamashita

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Niche-dependent modular regulation of the stem cell transcriptome separates cell identity and potential.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Rewinding the clock: mechanisms of dedifferentiation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Assessing Human Ribosomal DNA Variation and Its Association With Phenotypic Outcomes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan O NelsonWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Tomohiro KumonWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Yukiko M YamashitaWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-0216
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research · US

Funding

American Cancer Society (ACS) 133949-PF-19-133-01-DMCHoward Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) n/aJohn Templeton Foundation (JTF) RQ-46367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) encodes ribosomal RNA and exists as tandem repeats of hundreds of copies in the eukaryotic genome to meet the high demand of ribosome biogenesis. Tandemly repeated DNA elements are inherently unstable; thus, mechanisms must exist to maintain rDNA copy number (CN), in particular in the germline that continues through generations. A phenomenon called rDNA magnification was discovered over 50 y ago in Drosophila as a process that recovers the rDNA CN on chromosomes that harbor minimal CN. Our recent studies indicated that rDNA magnification is the mechanism to maintain rDNA CN under physiological conditions to counteract spontaneous CN loss that occurs during aging. Our previous studies that explored the mechanism of rDNA magnification implied that asymmetric division of germline stem cells (GSCs) may be particularly suited to achieve rDNA magnification. However, it remains elusive whether GSCs are the unique cell type that undergoes rDNA magnification or differentiating germ cells are also capable of magnification. In this study, we provide empirical evidence that suggests that rDNA magnification operates uniquely in GSCs, but not in differentiating germ cells. We further provide computer simulation that suggests that rDNA magnification is only achievable through asymmetric GSC divisions. We propose that despite known plasticity and transcriptomic similarity between GSCs and differentiating germ cells, GSCs' unique ability to divide asymmetrically serves a critical role of maintaining rDNA CN through generations, supporting germline immortality.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsComputer SimulationDNA, RibosomalDrosophila melanogasterGerm CellsStem CellsDNA, RibosomalDrosophila ProteinsDrosophila germlinegermline immortalityrDNA copy number maintenanceribosomal DNA

Identifiers

PMID37967216
PMCPMC10666004
OpenAlexW4388693120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.