Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37967120›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

OptiBreech collaborative care versus standard care for women with a breech-presenting fetus at term: A pilot parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial nested within a cohort.

Shawn Walker, Emma Spillane, Kate Stringer, Lauren Trepte, Siân M Davies, Jacana Bresson, Jane Sandall, Andrew Shennan, OptiBreech Collaborative

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shawn WalkerFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3658-8988
Emma SpillaneKingston Maternity, Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6663-7093
Kate StringerWomen's Services, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, United Kingdom.
Lauren TrepteWomen's and Children's Services, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Siân M DaviesFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jacana BressonFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jane SandallFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew ShennanFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
OptiBreech Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OptiBreech collaborative care is a multi-disciplinary care pathway for breech presentation at term, with continuity from a breech specialist midwife, including where chosen, for vaginal breech birth (VBB). Pilot randomised trial using unblinded 1:1 parallel group allocation to OptiBreech versus standard care, within a cohort. Participants were women with a breech-presenting fetus > 33 weeks, at four sites in England, January-June 2022. A two-stage consent process was used. Participants consented to undergo random selection to be offered a 'new care process', with a choice to accept it, or not. Primary objectives were to identify recruitment, acceptance, and attrition rates. Randomisation procedures and potential primary outcomes for a substantive study were also feasibility-tested. 68 women were randomised between January-June 2022. The consent process was acceptable to participants, but randomisation was unacceptable to women who specifically sought OptiBreech care. Two women withdrew due to concerns about sharing personal information. More women planned a VBB when randomised to OptiBreech Care (23.5% vs 0, p = .002, 95% CI = 9.3%,37.8%). Women randomised to OptiBreech care had: lower rates of cephalic presentation at birth (38.2% vs 54.5%), higher rates of vaginal birth (32.4% vs 24.2%), lower rates of in-labour caesarean birth (20.6% vs 36.4%), lower rates of neonatal intensive care (5.9% vs 9.1%), and lower rates of severe neonatal morbidity (2.9% vs 9.1%). Randomisation was stopped on the advice of the steering committee before the planned sample of 104, as lack of access to VBB within standard care prohibited comparison of outcomes. Demand for VBB is sufficient for a cohort study, but comparison of outcomes by 1:1 randomisation is not feasible. OptiBreech care would be best evaluated using stepped wedge cluster randomisation. Funded by the United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR300582). Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN 14521381.

Indexed as

Breech PresentationCesarean SectionCohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleFetusHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37967120
PMCPMC10650999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.