Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37967060›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Attitudes towards genetic testing: The role of genetic literacy, motivated cognition, and socio-demographic characteristics.

Maxim Likhanov, Ilya Zakharov, Adeyemi Awofala, Olusegun Ogundele, Fatos Selita, Yulia Kovas, Robert Chapman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neighborhood Opportunity and Genetic Literacy in a Representative Sample of US Adults.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Interaction of identity and beliefs with genetic literacy.American journal of human genetics · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maxim LikhanovState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Ilya ZakharovUral Federal University Named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Adeyemi AwofalaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijebu-Ode, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-3145-6011
Olusegun OgundeleDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijebu-Ode, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-7995-7021
Fatos SelitaDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Yulia KovasDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Robert ChapmanDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1696-1514

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding reasons for why people choose to have or not to have a genetic test is essential given the ever-increasing use of genetic technologies in everyday life. The present study explored the multiple drivers of people's attitudes towards genetic testing. Using the International Genetic Literacy and Attitudes Survey (iGLAS), we collected data on: (1) willingness to undergo testing; (2) genetic literacy; (3) motivated cognition; and (4) demographic and cultural characteristics. The 37 variables were explored in the largest to-date sample of 4311 participants from diverse demographic and cultural backgrounds. The results showed that 82% of participants were willing to undergo genetic testing for improved treatment; and over 73%-for research. The 35 predictor variables together explained only a small proportion of variance: 7%-in the willingness to test for Treatment; and 6%-for Research. The strongest predictors of willingness to undergo genetic testing were genetic knowledge and deterministic beliefs. Concerns about data misuse and about finding out unwanted health-related information were weakly negatively associated with willingness to undergo genetic testing. We also found some differences in factors linked to attitudes towards genetic testing across the countries included in this study. Our study demonstrates that decision-making regarding genetic testing is influenced by a large number of potentially interacting factors. Further research into these factors may help consumers to make decisions regarding genetic testing that are right for their specific circumstances.

Indexed as

AttitudeLiteracyCognitionDemographyGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumans

Identifiers

PMID37967060
PMCPMC10651000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.