Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37966870›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2023

Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict In-Hospital Mortality in Life-Threatening Ventricular Arrhythmias: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Le Li, Ligang Ding, Zhuxin Zhang, Likun Zhou, Zhenhao Zhang, Yulong Xiong, Zhao Hu, Yan Yao

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Le Li *National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8321-8480
Ligang Ding *National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5610-5974
Zhuxin ZhangNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6048-6610
Likun ZhouNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0000-5216-5657
Zhenhao ZhangNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0006-1501-2209
Yulong XiongNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5476-6405
Zhao HuNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8978-0637
Yan YaoNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fu Wai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4003-4323
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLife-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (LTVAs) are main causes of sudden cardiac arrest and are highly associated with an increased risk of mortality. A prediction model that enables early identification of the high-risk individuals is still lacking.

objectiveWe aimed to build machine learning (ML)-based models to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with LTVA.

methodsA total of 3140 patients with LTVA were randomly divided into training (n=2512, 80%) and internal validation (n=628, 20%) sets. Moreover, data of 2851 patients from another database were collected as the external validation set. The primary output was the probability of in-hospital mortality. The discriminatory ability was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The prediction performances of 5 ML algorithms were compared with 2 conventional scoring systems, namely, the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS-II) and the logistic organ dysfunction system (LODS).

resultsThe prediction performance of the 5 ML algorithms significantly outperformed the traditional models in predicting in-hospital mortality. CatBoost showed the highest AUC of 90.5% (95% CI 87.5%-93.5%), followed by LightGBM with an AUC of 90.1% (95% CI 86.8%-93.4%). Conversely, the predictive values of SAPS-II and LODS were unsatisfactory, with AUCs of 78.0% (95% CI 71.7%-84.3%) and 74.9% (95% CI 67.2%-82.6%), respectively. The superiority of ML-based models was also shown in the external validation set.

conclusionsML-based models could improve the predictive values of in-hospital mortality prediction for patients with LTVA compared with traditional scoring systems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArrhythmias, CardiacHospital MortalityHumansMachine LearningRetrospective Studiescardiaccritical carelife-threatening ventricular arrhythmiamachine learningmortalityprediction model

Identifiers

PMID37966870
PMCPMC10687678
OpenAlexW4388696829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.