ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2024
Small gastric synovial sarcoma diagnosed and treatment by laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery: a case report.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery for primary gastric synovial sarcoma: a rare case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a case of small gastric synovial sarcoma (SS) finally diagnosed after laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS). A 50 year-old male underwent medical examination for a chief complaint of epigastric pain. Endoscopic examination showed a 20 mm submucosal tumor (SMT) located in the anterior wall which extended to the lesser curvature of the middle stomach. The biopsy tissue did not yield a definitive diagnosis. During 6 months of follow-up for this lesion suspected to be an inflammatory tumor, neither the shape nor the size of the tumor changed. We performed LECS for both diagnosis and treatment. Histologically, the tumor was composed of fascicles of spindle cells. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were focally positive for epithelial membrane antigen, cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) and S100 protein, while being negative for desmin, α-smooth muscle actin, CD34, c-kit and DOG1. The expression of INI1 was reduced. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detected SS18 rearrangement. The SMT was diagnosed as primary SS. A SMT measuring < 20 mm might be malignant potential tumor such as SS even if there are no typical malignant findings by endoscopy. Surgical resection should be considered for SMT measuring < 20 mm with atypical findings even in the absence of definitive high-risk features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37966703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.