Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37966564›Full record

Trial reportJapanese journal of ophthalmology2024

Intraocular pressure changes at different gaze positions after superior rectus muscle-lateral rectus muscle loop myopexy in highly myopic strabismus.

Shinji Arai, Hiroko Suzuki, Shion Hayashi, Risako Inagaki, Takashi Haseoka, Akiko Hikoya, Miwa Komori, Tamami Shimizu, Yoshihiro Hotta, Miho Sato

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of surgical interventions for heavy eye syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shinji AraiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3125, Japan.
Hiroko SuzukiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3125, Japan.
Shion HayashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Risako InagakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3125, Japan.
Takashi HaseokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3125, Japan.
Akiko HikoyaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3125, Japan.
Miwa KomoriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3125, Japan.
Tamami ShimizuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3125, Japan.
Yoshihiro HottaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3125, Japan.
Miho SatoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3125, Japan. mihosato@hama-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0389-6274
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPYamagata University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16K11264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) at different gaze positions before and after superior rectus muscle-lateral rectus muscle (SR-LR) loop myopexy in highly myopic strabismus (HMS). STUDY

designNonrandomized clinical, prospective, interventional trial.

methodsFourteen patients with HMS (18 eyes) who underwent SR-LR loop myopexy were divided into 3 groups: < 100 prism diopters (PD) (mild esotropia [ET] group), > 100 PD (large ET group), and > 100 PD, and simultaneous recession of the medial rectus (MR) muscle was performed (large ET + MR group). Intraocular pressure was measured preoperatively and postoperatively at the primary, abduction, and adduction positions in each group.

resultsIntraocular pressure did not change after surgery in the mild ET group. Intraocular pressure significantly decreased in the abduction position (from 20.0 ± 2.1 to 16.0 ± 1.9 mmHg, P = 0.043) in the large ET group and in the abduction (from 22.2 ± 5.9 to 15.6 ± 4.3 mmHg, P = 0.048) and primary positions (from 15.8 ± 5.0 to 10.2 ± 2.8 mmHg, P = 0.043) in the large ET + MR group. The preoperative significant differences in IOP between the abduction and adduction positions in the large ET group (7.4 ± 3.4 mmHg) and the large ET + MR group (10.0 ± 5.5 mmHg) disappeared postoperatively (3.2 ± 2.8 mmHg and 3.6 ± 1.7 mmHg, respectively). The differences in IOP between abduction and adduction were similar in all the groups.

conclusionSR-LR loop myopexy decreased IOP in patients with HMS in the abduction and primary positions.

Indexed as

EsotropiaMyopiaStrabismusHumansIntraocular PressureOculomotor MusclesOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEsotropiaHighly myopic strabismusIntraocular pressureLoop myopexyStrabismus surgery

Identifiers

PMID37966564
OpenAlexW4388703756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.