Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37966559›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2024

A Mixed-Methods Study on Topical Fluoride Beliefs and Refusal Behaviors for Caregivers of Children with Special Health Care Needs.

Madelyn Koh, Darragh Kerr, Courtney M Hill, Donald L Chi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Behavioral Correlates of Caregiver-Reported Oral Health of Individuals With Joubert Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madelyn KohDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, B530D, Box 357475, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-1909
Darragh KerrDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, B530D, Box 357475, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Courtney M HillDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, B530D, Box 357475, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Donald L ChiDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, B530D, Box 357475, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. dchi@uw.edu.

Funding

Developing Topical Fluoride Hesitancy Measures for Causal Modeling and Intervention ResearchR01DE026741 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CHI, DONALD LESLIE · 2018 to 2021
$1.7M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026741NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE026741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand topical fluoride-related beliefs and refusal behaviors for caregivers of children with special health care needs (CSHCN).

methodsThis was an explanatory sequential mixed methods study. For the quantitative analyses, we surveyed 520 caregivers to (a) compare fluoride-related beliefs between caregivers of CSHCN and caregivers of healthy children and (b) evaluate the association between special health care need (SHCN) status and topical fluoride refusal. We used logistic regression models to generate unadjusted odds ratios, confounder-adjusted odds ratios (AOR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). For the qualitative analyses, we interviewed 56 caregivers who refused or were hesitant about topical fluoride. Data were coded deductively and compared by SHCN status to an existing conceptual model of topical fluoride refusal.

resultsIn the quantitative analysis, 41.3% of caregivers refused or thought about refusing topical fluoride. There were no significant differences in fluoride beliefs by SHCN status (p-values > 0.05) nor was there a significant association between SHCN status and topical fluoride refusal (AOR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.37-1.14; p = 0.13). In the qualitative analysis, the relative importance of each domain of the conceptual model was similar between the caregiver groups. Two differences were that all caregivers of CSHCN thought fluoride was unnecessary and wanted to keep chemicals out of their child's body. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: While caregivers of CSHCN were not more likely to refuse topical fluoride than caregivers of healthy children, there may be important differences in the underlying reasons for refusing topical fluoride.

Indexed as

Children with DisabilitiesFluorides, TopicalCaregiversChildFluoridesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesFluoridesFluorides, TopicalChildren with disabilitiesDental care for the disabledFluorideHealth belief modelMixed methodsTopical fluorideTreatment refusal

Identifiers

PMID37966559
PMCPMC10876822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.