Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37966532›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in sacral tumour surgery and comprehensive description of a multidisciplinary program: a prospective study in a specialized hospital in China.

Jun Wang, Chen Chen, Dasen Li, Yi Yang, Junjun Xu, Lei Zhang, Fei Huo, Wei Guo, Xiaodong Tang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun WangPeking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China. pkuwj2010@163.com.
Chen ChenDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China. zycchen@sina.com.
Dasen LiPeking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China.
Yi YangPeking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China.
Junjun XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China.
Lei ZhangPeking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China.
Fei HuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China.
Wei GuoPeking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China. bonetumor@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2471-5767
Xiaodong TangPeking University People's Hospital, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China. tang15877@126.com.
Peking University · CN

Funding

Clinical Medicine Plus X-Young Scholars Project, Peking University, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities PKU2023LCXQ016Natural Science Foundation of China 82272947Peking University People's Hospital Research And Development Funds RDG2021-02, RDL2022-14, RZ2023-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere were fewer data to guide the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) theory into sacral tumour surgery. In the present study, we were aiming to describe a multidisciplinary program of ERAS and evaluate the availability in sacral tumour surgery.

methodsThis was a prospective study of patients with sacral tumour between March 2021 and September 2021 at a single centre. We proposed a multidisciplinary program of ERAS for pre-admission, preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and post-discharge clinical care which positively influenced outcomes of patients with sacral tumour. All patients were prospectively assigned into two groups, ERAS group in which patients received ERAS protocols (n = 63), No-ERAS group in which patients had conventional clinical pathways (n = 62). Patient data were collected which included demographics, preoperative preparation, detailed information of surgical procedure, 60-day reoperation rate, 60-day readmission, postoperative length of stay (PLOS), time to first ambulation and flatus after surgery, time to removal of last drainage tube, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at first ambulation and discharge. Complications referred to ones that occurred within 60 days after surgery. The above parameters were compared between ERAS group and No-ERAS group.

resultsTime to first ambulation after surgery in ERAS group (mean 20.9 h) was significantly shorter than that in No-ERAS group (mean 104.3 ho). Meanwhile, time to first flatus after surgery in ERAS group (mean 26.7 h) was also significantly shorter than that in No-ERAS group (mean 37.3 h). Patients in ERAS group had statistically shorter PLOS (10.7 days) as compared to that in No-ERAS group (13.8 days). In ERAS group, 19 of 63 patients (30.2%) were discharged within seven days after surgery as compared to seven of 62 patients (11.3%) in No-ERAS group. VAS score at first ambulation in ERAS group was not obviously higher than that in No-ERAS group though the time of first ambulation in ERAS group was statistically earlier than one in No-ERAS group. Furthermore, VAS score at discharge in ERAS group was significantly lower than that in No-ERAS group. The rate of postoperative incision necrosis was 6.3% (4/63) in ERAS group and 8.1% (5/62) in No-ERAS group and all of these nine patients underwent reoperation before discharge. The difference was not statistically significant in the wound complication of incision necrosis and 60-day reoperation rate. Only one readmission occurred in No-ERAS group due to the surgical site infection and also there was no significant difference of 60-day readmission rate between these two groups. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference of complications of femoral artery thrombosis and rectal rupture between ERAS group and No-ERAS group.

conclusionsOur proposed ERAS pathway for sacral tumour surgery and early walking facilitate safe and prompt discharge. ERAS protocols of sacral tumour surgery could decrease PLOS without significantly increasing postoperative complications, 60-day readmission rate and 60-day reoperation rate. The application of ERAS pathway in the field of sacral tumour surgery should have personalized feature with regard to resection type.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryNeoplasmsAftercareFlatulenceHospitalsHumansLength of StayNecrosisPatient DischargePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesEnhanced recovery after surgeryMultidisciplinary programPrognosisSacral tumour

Identifiers

PMID37966532
OpenAlexW4388703081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.