Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37966506›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

A US real-world study of treatment patterns and outcomes in localized or locally advanced prostate cancer patients.

Stephen J Freedland, Sandhya Nair, Xiwu Lin, Lawrence Karsh, Christopher Pieczonka, Ravi Potluri, Sabine D Brookman-May, Suneel D Mundle, Sarah Fleming, Neeraj Agarwal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephen J FreedlandCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Stephen.Freedland@cshs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-6419
Sandhya NairJanssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Xiwu LinJanssen Global Services, Horsham, PA, USA.
Lawrence KarshThe Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
Christopher PieczonkaAssociated Medical Professionals of NY, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Ravi PotluriPutnam Associates, HEOR & RWE, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0509-2659
Sabine D Brookman-MayJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2967-4028
Suneel D MundleJanssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Sarah FlemingJanssen Global Services, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Neeraj AgarwalHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Janssen (United States) · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USJanssen (Belgium) · BESUNY Upstate Medical University · USThe Urology Center of Colorado · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMen with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (LPC/LAPC) are at risk of progression after radiotherapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). Using real-world data, we evaluated patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in LPC/LAPC.

methodsOptum claims and electronic health records (EHR) data from January 2010 to December 2021 were queried for men with LPC/LAPC who received primary RT, RP, or androgen deprivation therapy alone within 180 days after diagnosis. Survival outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier curves. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was compared in patients with and without evidence of disease (i.e., disease recurrence, metastasis, diagnosis of castration-resistant PC) at defined time points.

results61,772 and 62,361 men in claims and EHR cohorts met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 719 and 901 days, respectively. Most men received primary RT (51.0% claims, 35.0% EHR) or RP (39.4% claims, 53.8% EHR). Survival was greatest among men treated with RP, followed by RT. Adjusted for age and comorbidity, rwOS was shorter among men with evidence of disease within 1, 3, 4, and 5 years after primary treatment than those without at the same time points.

conclusionReal-world claims and EHR data show that survival among men with LPC/LAPC differs by primary treatment and time point of disease recurrence thereafter. Poor outcomes in men with LPC/LAPC who progress early indicate an unmet medical need for more effective primary treatment. If validated for surrogacy, no evidence of disease at specific time points could represent an intermediate efficacy endpoint in future trials.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatectomyTreatment OutcomeAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogen deprivation therapyDisease trajectoriesProstate cancerProstatectomyRadiotherapySurvival outcomes

Identifiers

PMID37966506
PMCPMC10693516
OpenAlexW4388695310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.