ArticleeLife2023
Combined transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography reveals alterations in cortical excitability during pain.
Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulation of evoked alpha oscillatory activity in the frontocentral region during analgesia by non-invasive brain stimulation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Top-down influence of the inferior frontal gyrus on motor cortex excitability during pain empathy.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Mu-Rhythm Phase Modulates Cortical Reactivity to Subthreshold TMS: A TMS-EEG Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Temperature effects on TMS-Derived measures of cortical excitability: a systematic review and implications for a warming climate.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
- Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Control Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Sources of the N15 TMS-evoked potential following motor cortex stimulation localize rostrals to TMS-induced electric fields and depend on dose.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Experimental acute muscle pain and itch induce similar inhibitory effects on corticospinal excitability.Pain reports · 2025Article
- The effect of prolonged elbow pain and rTMS on TMS-evoked potentials: A TMS-EEG study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- The reliability and validity of rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping for muscles under active contraction.BMC neuroscience · 2024Article
- A 5-day course of rTMS before pain onset ameliorates future pain and increases sensorimotor peak alpha frequency.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Extracting reproducible components from electroencephalographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation with group task-related component analysis.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
- Modulating cortical excitability through transcranial direct current stimulation combined with therapeutic exercise for craniofacial myofascial pain: Randomized controlled trial.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to examine inhibitory and facilitatory circuits during experimental pain and in chronic pain populations. However, current applications of TMS to pain have been restricted to measurements of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from peripheral muscles. Here, TMS was combined with electroencephalography (EEG) to determine whether experimental pain could induce alterations in cortical inhibitory/facilitatory activity observed in TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). In Experiment 1 (n=29), multiple sustained thermal stimuli were administered to the forearm, with the first, second, and third block of thermal stimuli consisting of warm but non-painful (pre-pain block), painful (pain block) and warm but non-painful (post-pain block) temperatures, respectively. During each stimulus, TMS pulses were delivered while EEG (64 channels) was simultaneously recorded. Verbal pain ratings were collected between TMS pulses. Relative to pre-pain warm stimuli, painful stimuli led to an increase in the amplitude of the frontocentral negative peak ~45 ms post-TMS (N45), with a larger increase associated with higher pain ratings. Experiments 2 and 3 (n=10 in each) showed that the increase in the N45 in response to pain was not due to changes in sensory potentials associated with TMS, or a result of stronger reafferent muscle feedback during pain. This is the first study to use combined TMS-EEG to examine alterations in cortical excitability in response to pain. These results suggest that the N45 TEP peak, which indexes GABAergic neurotransmission, is implicated in pain perception and is a potential marker of individual differences in pain sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.