Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965978›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2024

Embedded multilevel regression and poststratification: Model-based inference with incomplete auxiliary information.

Katherine Li, Yajuan Si

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. On the Use of Auxiliary Variables in Multilevel Regression and Poststratification.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine LiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Yajuan SiSurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8707-7374
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Statistical adjustments of sample representation in community-level estimates of COVID-19 transmission and immunityU01MD017867 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SI, YAJUAN · 2022 to 2025
$2.2M
NIMHD NIH HHS U01 MD017867NIMHD NIH HHS U01MD017867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health disparity research often evaluates health outcomes across demographic subgroups. Multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) is a popular approach for small subgroup estimation as it can stabilize estimates by fitting multilevel models and adjust for selection bias by poststratifying on auxiliary variables, which are population characteristics predictive of the analytic outcome. However, the granularity and quality of the estimates produced by MRP are limited by the availability of the auxiliary variables' joint distribution; data analysts often only have access to the marginal distributions. To overcome this limitation, we embed the estimation of population cell counts needed for poststratification into the MRP workflow: embedded MRP (EMRP). Under EMRP, we generate synthetic populations of the auxiliary variables before implementing MRP. All sources of estimation uncertainty are propagated with a fully Bayesian framework. Through simulation studies, we compare different methods of generating the synthetic populations and demonstrate EMRP's improvements over alternatives on the bias-variance tradeoff to yield valid subpopulation inferences of interest. We apply EMRP to the Longitudinal Survey of Wellbeing and estimate food insecurity prevalence among vulnerable groups in New York City. We find that all EMRP estimators can correct for the bias in classical MRP while maintaining lower standard errors and narrower confidence intervals than directly imputing with the weighted finite population Bayesian bootstrap (WFPBB) and design-based estimates. Performances from the EMRP estimators do not differ substantially from each other, though we would generally recommend using the WFPBB-MRP for its consistently high coverage rates.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremBiasComputer SimulationHumansLongitudinal StudiesSelection BiasBayesian bootstrapincomplete poststratifierssequential imputationsynthetic population

Identifiers

PMID37965978
PMCPMC11418010
OpenAlexW4388689002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.