Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965637›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2023

Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Cantonese Version of SarQoL in Hong Kong's Older Population: An Interviewer-Administered Questionnaire for Assessing Sarcopenia-Specific Quality of Life in Fieldwork Practice.

Ruby Yu, Derek Lai, Grace Leung, Lok-Yan Tam, Clara Cheng, Sara Kong, Cecilia Tong, Zhihui Lu, Jason C S Leung, Amany Chan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ruby YuDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-7051-4689
Derek LaiThe Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Grace LeungThe Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-4180-3611
Lok-Yan TamThe Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Clara ChengThe Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Sara KongThe Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Cecilia TongThe Jockey Club Institute of Ageing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Zhihui LuDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Jason C S LeungThe Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Amany ChanThe Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Timothy KwokDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-9253-3549
Jean WooDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-7593-3081
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the psychometric properties of the Cantonese version of the SarQoL Participants: A total of 118 (including 60 non-sarcopenic and 58 sarcopenic) community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or above with Cantonese as their mother tongue. Methods: Translation and cultural adaptation of the SarQoL were conducted using a standardized protocol. To validate the Cantonese SarQoL, psychometric properties including discriminative power, reliability (including internal consistency and test-retest reliability), and construct validity (including convergent and divergent validity), as well as floor and ceiling effects, were assessed. Results: The translation of the questionnaire was completed without significant difficulties. Results indicated that the Cantonese SarQoL had (1) good discriminative power (sarcopenic participants had lower overall scores, mean = 66.1 vs 75.0, Conclusion: The Cantonese SarQoL is valid and reliable, and thus can be used as an interviewer-administered questionnaire for assessing sarcopenia-specific quality of life in fieldwork practice.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSarcopeniaAgedHong KongHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesinterviewer-administered questionnairepsychometricquality of lifesarcopeniaSarQoLtranslationvalidation

Identifiers

PMID37965637
PMCPMC10642387
OpenAlexW4388535132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.