Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965613›Full record

ArticleData in brief2023

Mint leaves: Dried, fresh, and spoiled dataset for condition analysis and machine learning applications.

Rohini Jadhav, Yogesh Suryawanshi, Yashashree Bedmutha, Kailas Patil, Prawit Chumchu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dataset ofData in brief · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A comprehensive lemongrass (Data in brief · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Data in brief · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rohini JadhavBharati Vidyapeeth College of Engineering, Pune, India.
Yogesh SuryawanshiVishwakarma University, Pune, India.
Yashashree BedmuthaVishwakarma University, Pune, India.
Kailas PatilVishwakarma University, Pune, India.
Prawit ChumchuKasetsart University, Sriracha, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a comprehensive dataset of 5,323 images of mint (pudina) leaves in various conditions, including dried, fresh, and spoiled. The dataset is designed to facilitate research in the domain of condition analysis and machine learning applications for leaf quality assessment. Each category of the dataset contains a diverse range of images captured under controlled conditions, ensuring variations in lighting, background, and leaf orientation. The dataset also includes manual annotations for each image, which categorize them into the respective conditions. This dataset has the potential to be used to train and evaluate machine learning algorithms and computer vision models for accurate discernment of the condition of mint leaves. This could enable rapid quality assessment and decision-making in various industries, such as agriculture, food preservation, and pharmaceuticals. We invite researchers to explore innovative approaches to advance the field of leaf quality assessment and contribute to the development of reliable automated systems using our dataset and its associated annotations.

Indexed as

Condition analysisDatasetImage classificationMachine learningMint leavesQuality assessment

Identifiers

PMID37965613
PMCPMC10641137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.