Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965497›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in big data2023

Recommender systems for sustainability: overview and research issues.

Alexander Felfernig, Manfred Wundara, Thi Ngoc Trang Tran, Seda Polat-Erdeniz, Sebastian Lubos, Merfat El Mansi, Damian Garber, Viet-Man Le

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in big data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander FelfernigApplied Software Engineering & AI, Institute of Software Technology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Manfred WundaraMagistrat Villach, Villach, Austria.
Thi Ngoc Trang TranApplied Software Engineering & AI, Institute of Software Technology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Seda Polat-ErdenizApplied Software Engineering & AI, Institute of Software Technology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Sebastian LubosApplied Software Engineering & AI, Institute of Software Technology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Merfat El MansiApplied Software Engineering & AI, Institute of Software Technology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Damian GarberApplied Software Engineering & AI, Institute of Software Technology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Viet-Man LeApplied Software Engineering & AI, Institute of Software Technology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainability development goals (SDGs) are regarded as a universal call to action with the overall objectives of planet protection, ending of poverty, and ensuring peace and prosperity for all people. In order to achieve these objectives, different AI technologies play a major role. Specifically, recommender systems can provide support for organizations and individuals to achieve the defined goals. Recommender systems integrate AI technologies such as machine learning, explainable AI (XAI), case-based reasoning, and constraint solving in order to find and explain user-relevant alternatives from a potentially large set of options. In this article, we summarize the state of the art in applying recommender systems to support the achievement of sustainability development goals. In this context, we discuss open issues for future research.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningrecommender systemssustainabilitysustainability development goals

Identifiers

PMID37965497
PMCPMC10642936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.