ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Cuproptosis in ccRCC: key player in therapeutic and prognostic targets.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Prognostic Value of Tumour-Associated Genes in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Through Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Insights.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Classical biomarkers have been used to classify clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients in a variety of ways, and emerging evidences have indicated that cuproptosis is closely related to mitochondrial metabolism, thereby accelerating the development and progression of ccRCC. Nevertheless, the specific relationship between cuproptosis and the prognosis and treatment of ccRCC remains unclear. Methods: We comprehensively integrated several ccRCC patient datasets into a large cohort. Following that, we systematically analyzed multi-omics data to demonstrate the differences between two cuproptosis clusters. Results: We identified two cuproptosis clusters in ccRCC patients. Among the two clusters, cluster 1 patients showed favorable prognosis. We then confirmed the significant differences between the two clusters, including more typical cancer hallmarks were enriched in cluster 2 patients; cluster 2 patients were more susceptible to develop mutations and had a lower level of gistic score and mRNAsi. Importantly, both Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion analysis and subclass mapping algorithm showed that cuproptosis 1 patients were more susceptible to be responded to immunotherapy. In addition, a prognostic signature was successfully developed and also showed prominent predictive power in response to immunotherapy. Conclusion: As a result of our findings, we were able to classify ccRCC patients according to cuproptosis in a novel way. By constructing the cuproptosis clusters and developing the signature, patients with ccRCC could have a more accurate prognosis prediction and better immunotherapy options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.