ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
The Joint Research Centre-European Network of Cancer Registries Quality Check Software (JRC-ENCR QCS).
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data resource profile: National Cancer Registry Ireland.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Initial Data Analysis for Cancer Registries: A Structured Framework and Demonstration Using Slovenian Cancer Registry Data.Cancers · 2026Article
- Persistence burden and poor survival of pleural mesothelioma in central Italy, 2013-2022: a population-based study thirty years after asbestos ban.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Evaluating robustly standardized explainable anomaly detection of implausible variables in cancer data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Prevention of cancer-Melanoma development and its diagnosis among Silesian Voivodeship residents: Preliminary results.Medicine · 2024Article
- Geographical and temporal differences in gastric and oesophageal cancer registration by subsite and morphology in Europe.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Facing further challenges in cancer data quality and harmonisation.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- An ontology-based approach for developing a harmonised data-validation tool for European cancer registration.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The core activity of population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) is to gather information from all new cancer cases in a defined geographic area, in order to measure the magnitude of cancer burden and to provide a basis for cancer research. The Joint Research Centre-European Network of Cancer Registries Quality Check Software (JRC-ENCR QCS) is a Java standalone desktop application, under development since 2015, created to support PBCRs in the validation of the collected data. The JRC-ENCR QCS performs internal consistency checks on the cancer registry dataset, to detect impossible or unlikely codes or combination of codes, and is thereby an important tool to support the validation efforts by registries and improve data quality and European-wide harmonisation. The software package also includes the JRC CSV Data layout converter, a complementary tool for transforming PBCR incidence files into a format compatible with the JRC-ENCR QCS. This paper gives an overview of the JRC-ENCR QCS, describing the role of the software in processing data files submitted by PBCRs contributing to the European Cancer Information System (ECIS) as well as its functionalities. The development of the JRC-ENCR QCS is an evolving process, with regular updates implementing new and revised European and International recommendations and classifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.