ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Maximum intensity projection based on high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of breast tumors.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Qualitative and quantitative analysis of solid renal tumors by high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Significance of maximum intensity projection technique of multimodal ultrasound imaging in differentiating follicular thyroid carcinoma from benign lesions.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We explored the role of maximum intensity projection (MIP) based on high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (H-CEUS) for the differentiation of breast tumors. Methods: MIP imaging was performed in patients with breast tumors who underwent H-CEUS examinations. The microvasculature morphology of breast tumors was assessed. The receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MIP. Results: Forty-three breast tumors were finally analyzed, consisting of 19 benign and 24 malignant tumors. For the ≤30-s and >30-s phases, dot-, line-, or branch-like patterns were significantly more common in benign tumors. A tree-like pattern was only present in the benign tumors. A crab claw-like pattern was significantly more common in the malignant tumors. Among the tumors with crab claw-like patterns, three cases of malignant tumors had multiple parallel small spiculated vessels. There were significant differences in the microvasculature morphology for the ≤30-s and >30-s phases between the benign and malignant tumors (all Conclusion: MIP based on H-CEUS can be used for the differentiation of breast tumors, and the ≤30-s phase had a better diagnostic value. Multiple parallel small spiculated vessels were a new finding, which could provide new insight for the subsequent study of breast tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.