Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965436›Full record

ReviewQRB discovery2023

How sequence alterations enhance the stability and delay expansion of DNA triplet repeat domains.

Jens Völker, Kenneth J Breslauer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in QRB discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jens VölkerDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-8209
Kenneth J BreslauerDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9182-0033
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA sequence alterations within DNA repeat domains inexplicably enhance the stability and delay the expansion of interrupted repeat domains. Here we propose mechanisms that rationalise such unanticipated outcomes. Specifically, we describe how interruption of a DNA repeat domain restricts the ensemble space available to dynamic, slip out, repeat bulge loops by introducing energetic barriers to loop migration. We explain how such barriers arise because some possible loop isomers result in energetically costly mismatches in the duplex portion of the repeat domain. We propose that the reduced ensemble space is the causative feature for the observed delay in repeat DNA expansion. We further posit that the observed loss of the interrupting repeat in some expanded DNAs reflects the transient occupation of loop isomer positions that result in a mismatch in the duplex stem due to 'leakiness' in the energy barrier. We propose that if the lifetime of such a low probability event allows for recognition by the mismatch repair system, then 'repair' of the repeat interruption can occur; thereby rationalising the absence of the interruption in the final expanded DNA 'product.' Our proposed mechanistic pathways provide reasoned explanations for what have been described as 'puzzling' observations, while also yielding insights into a biomedically important set of coupled genotypic phenomena that map the linkage between DNA origami thermodynamics and phenotypic disease states.

Indexed as

DNA conformational spaceDNA expansion/contractionrepeat DNA origamirepeat mismatch repairstability-functional correlations

Identifiers

PMID37965436
PMCPMC10641665
OpenAlexW4388414553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.