Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965237›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Up-to-Date Diagnostic CT Standards for Acute Appendicitis: Wall Thickness and Intraluminal Fluid Thickness.

Mohammad Wazzan, Ahmed Abduljabbar, Huda Khizindar, Aghnar Alzahrani, Renad M Aljohani, Rana Nahas, Rahf Aman, Shouq Tawfiq, Arwa Aldajani

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad WazzanDepartment of Radiology, King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU.
Ahmed AbduljabbarDepartment of Radiology, King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU.
Huda KhizindarDepartment of Radiology, King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU.
Aghnar AlzahraniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Albaha University, Baha, SAU.
Renad M AljohaniDepartment of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Rana NahasDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ibn Sina National College, Jeddah, SAU.
Rahf AmanDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Shouq TawfiqDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, King Faisal University, Jeddah, SAU.
Arwa AldajaniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
King Abdulaziz University · SAAlfaisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is a prevalent condition that requires accurate and timely diagnosis and management to avoid potential complications. Classically, the diagnosis of appendicitis is made using the appendicular outer-to-outer wall diameter. In this study, we examined the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) scans for diagnosing acute appendicitis using wall thickness and lumen thickness rather than diameter. This study included data from 350 patients who presented to the emergency department with clinically suspected acute appendicitis. All patients underwent a CT scan, and 62 radiologically positive patients underwent surgery. A radiological diagnosis was made using the conventional outer-to-outer wall diameter with a cut-off of 6 mm for a positive diagnosis. These 62 positive CT scans were reviewed and compared with surgical results. The study showed that a threshold of 2.25 mm for appendicular lumen thickness is an excellent diagnostic tool for acute appendicitis, demonstrating a high sensitivity of 96.4% and a lower specificity of 67%. In contrast, 1.6 mm wall thickness indicates acute appendicitis, with 81.8% sensitivity and 84% specificity. However, the wall thickness remains inferior to the conventionally used measurement of 6.75 mm for appendicular diameter, with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 100%.

Indexed as

acute appendicitisct scandiagnostic accuracylumen thicknesssensitivity and specificitywall thickness

Identifiers

PMID37965237
PMCPMC10643053
OpenAlexW4388232701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.