Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965219›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

3D U-Net for automated detection of multiple sclerosis lesions: utility of transfer learning from other pathologies.

Stephen G Wahlig, Pierre Nedelec, David A Weiss, Jeffrey D Rudie, Leo P Sugrue, Andreas M Rauschecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen G WahligCenter for Intelligent Imaging (ci2), Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Pierre NedelecCenter for Intelligent Imaging (ci2), Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
David A WeissCenter for Intelligent Imaging (ci2), Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Jeffrey D RudieCenter for Intelligent Imaging (ci2), Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Leo P SugrueCenter for Intelligent Imaging (ci2), Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Andreas M RauscheckerCenter for Intelligent Imaging (ci2), Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Deep learning algorithms for segmentation of multiple sclerosis (MS) plaques generally require training on large datasets. This manuscript evaluates the effect of transfer learning from segmentation of another pathology to facilitate use of smaller MS-specific training datasets. That is, a model trained for detection of one type of pathology was re-trained to identify MS lesions and active demyelination. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study using MRI exams from 149 patients spanning 4/18/2014 to 7/8/2021, 3D convolutional neural networks were trained with a variable number of manually-segmented MS studies. Models were trained for FLAIR lesion segmentation at a single timepoint, new FLAIR lesion segmentation comparing two timepoints, and enhancing (actively demyelinating) lesion segmentation on T1 post-contrast imaging. Models were trained either de-novo or fine-tuned with transfer learning applied to a pre-existing model initially trained on non-MS data. Performance was evaluated with lesionwise sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Results: For single timepoint FLAIR lesion segmentation with 10 training studies, a fine-tuned model demonstrated improved performance [lesionwise sensitivity 0.55 ± 0.02 (mean ± standard error), PPV 0.66 ± 0.02] compared to a de-novo model (sensitivity 0.49 ± 0.02, Conclusion: By fine-tuning models trained for other disease pathologies with MS-specific data, competitive models identifying existing MS plaques, new MS plaques, and active demyelination can be built with substantially smaller datasets than would otherwise be required to train new models.

Indexed as

deep learningdemyelinationmultiple sclerosissegmentationtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37965219
PMCPMC10641790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.