Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965148›Full record

ArticleiScience2023

LncRNA-Top: Controlled deep learning approaches for lncRNA gene regulatory relationship annotations across different platforms.

Weidun Xie, Xingjian Chen, Zetian Zheng, Fuzhou Wang, Xiaowei Zhu, Qiuzhen Lin, Yanni Sun, Ka-Chun Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weidun XieDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Xingjian ChenDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Zetian ZhengDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Fuzhou WangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Xiaowei ZhuDepartment of Neuroscience, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Qiuzhen LinCollege of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yanni SunDepartment of Electrical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Ka-Chun WongDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By soaking microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have the potential to regulate gene expression. Few methods have been created based on this mechanism to anticipate the lncRNA-gene relationship prediction. Hence, we present lncRNA-Top to forecast potential lncRNA-gene regulation relationships. Specifically, we constructed controlled deep-learning methods using 12417 lncRNAs and 16127 genes. We have provided retrospective and innovative views among negative sampling, random seeds, cross-validation, metrics, and independent datasets. The AUC, AUPR, and our defined precision@k were leveraged to evaluate performance. In-depth case studies demonstrate that 47 out of 100 projected top unknown pairings were recorded in publications, supporting the predictive power. Our additional software can annotate the scores with target candidates. The lncRNA-Top will be a helpful tool to uncover prospective lncRNA targets and better comprehend the regulatory processes of lncRNAs.

Indexed as

clinical geneticsmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37965148
PMCPMC10641498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.