Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965099›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2023

Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Michael M Tadros, Marian S Boshra, Michael Scott, Glenda Fleming, Fidelma Magee, Mohammad I Hamed, Ahmed Abuelhana, Aaron Courtenay, Heba F Salem, Kathryn Burnett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael M TadrosSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Marian S BoshraClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, P.O. Box 62514, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Michael ScottMedicines Optimisation and Innovation Centre (MOIC), Antrim Area Hospital, Antrim, UK.
Glenda FlemingMedicines Optimisation and Innovation Centre (MOIC), Antrim Area Hospital, Antrim, UK.
Fidelma MageePharmacy Department, Northern Health and Social Care Trust (NHSCT), Antrim, UK.
Mohammad I HamedClinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST University), P.O. Box 12566, Giza, Egypt.
Ahmed AbuelhanaSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0823-4736
Aaron CourtenaySchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Heba F SalemDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, P.O. Box 62514, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Kathryn BurnettRegional Pharmaceutical Procurement Service, Northern Health and Social Care Trust (NHSCT), Antrim, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increased antimicrobial resistance patterns lead to limited options for antimicrobial agents, affecting patient health and increasing hospital costs. Objectives: To investigate the antimicrobial prescribing patterns at two district hospitals in Northern Ireland before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A mixed prospective-retrospective study was designed to compare pre- and during pandemic antimicrobial prescribing data in both hospitals using a Global Point Prevalence Survey. Results: Of the 591 patients surveyed in both hospitals, 43.8% were treated with 402 antimicrobials. A total of 82.8% of antimicrobial prescriptions were for empirical treatment. No significant difference existed in numbers of patients treated or antimicrobials used before and during the pandemic. There was a slight decrease of 3.3% in the compliance rate with hospital antimicrobial guidelines during the pandemic when compared with the pre-pandemic year of 2019, when it was 69.5%. Treatment based on patients' biomarker data also slightly decreased from 83.5% pre-pandemic (2019) to 81.5% during the pandemic (2021). Conclusions: There was no overall significant impact of the pandemic on the antimicrobial prescribing patterns in either hospital when compared with the pre-pandemic findings. The antimicrobial stewardship programmes would appear to have played an important role in controlling antimicrobial consumption during the pandemic.

Identifiers

PMID37965099
PMCPMC10642613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.