Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2023
COPD Risk Factor Profiles in General Population and Referred Patients: Potential Etiotypes.
Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Never-Smokers-A Distinct Entity Within the COPD Spectrum.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Asthma-Associated COPD Etiotype: Clinical Features and Inflammatory Patterns in Biological Samples.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Validation of new predictors of mortality and BODE index variants in patients with COPD at moderate altitude.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes of Eosinophilic COPD in a Saudi Population: A Retrospective Study.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify the risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in view of potential etiotypes in a general population and referred COPD patients. Patients and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional observational study utilizing two distinct datasets: a dataset of a general population including 2430 subjects with COPD from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) and another dataset of referral clinics including 579 patients with COPD from the Korean Obstructive Lung Disease (KOLD). Results: The mean age of both groups was 67 years, and 71.2% and 93.8% were male in the COPD subjects from the KNHANES and the KOLD, respectively. The mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second of predicted value was 79.1% (KNHANES) and 55.4% (KOLD). The frequency of risk factors of cigarette smoking (C), infection (I), pollution (P), and asthma (A) was 54.6%, 9.4%, 10.7%, and 7.9%, respectively, in the KNHANES COPD subjects, and 88.4%, 26.6%, 41.6%, and 35.2%, respectively, in the KOLD COPD subjects. Risk factors were unidentified in 32.6% (KNHANES) and 3.1% (KOLD) of COPD subjects. Additionally, 14.1% and 66.2% of subjects with COPD had two or more risk factors in the KNHANES and KOLD, respectively. Conclusion: The profiles of risk factors C, I, P, and A were identified and appeared to be different among the two COPD groups from a general population or referral clinics. In some of the COPD subjects, risk factors were not identified, so we should endeavour to find out unidentified COPD risk factors, especially in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.