Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965048›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

CRISPR-based bioengineering in microalgae for production of industrially important biomolecules.

Dhananjay Dhokane, Arshi Shaikh, Anu Yadav, Nandinee Giri, Anindya Bandyopadhyay, Santanu Dasgupta, Bhaskar Bhadra

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Microbial Metabolism: Primary and Secondary Metabolites.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Growing Algae in Biofilms: Principles and Emerging Opportunities.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The versatility of algae in addressing the global sustainability challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dhananjay DhokaneSynthetic Biology Group, Reliance Industries Ltd., Navi Mumbai, India.
Arshi ShaikhSynthetic Biology Group, Reliance Industries Ltd., Navi Mumbai, India.
Anu YadavSynthetic Biology Group, Reliance Industries Ltd., Navi Mumbai, India.
Nandinee GiriSynthetic Biology Group, Reliance Industries Ltd., Navi Mumbai, India.
Anindya BandyopadhyaySynthetic Biology Group, Reliance Industries Ltd., Navi Mumbai, India.
Santanu DasguptaSynthetic Biology Group, Reliance Industries Ltd., Navi Mumbai, India.
Bhaskar BhadraSynthetic Biology Group, Reliance Industries Ltd., Navi Mumbai, India.
Reliance Industries (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microalgae, as photosynthetic organisms, have the potential to produce biomolecules for use in food, feed, cosmetics, nutraceuticals, fuel, and other applications. Faster growth rates and higher protein and lipid content make microalgae a popular chassis for many industrial applications. However, challenges such as low productivity and high production costs have limited their commercialization. To overcome these challenges, bioengineering approaches such as genetic engineering, metabolic engineering, and synthetic biology have been employed to improve the productivity and quality of microalgae-based products. Genetic engineering employing genome editing tools like CRISPR/Cas allows precise and targeted genetic modifications. CRISPR/Cas systems are presently used to modify the genetic makeup of microalgae for enhanced production of specific biomolecules. However, these tools are yet to be explored explicitly in microalgae owing to some limitations. Despite the progress made in CRISPR-based bioengineering approaches, there is still a need for further research to optimize the production of microalgae-based products. This includes improving the efficiency of genome editing tools, understanding the regulatory mechanisms of microalgal metabolism, and optimizing growth conditions and cultivation strategies. Additionally, addressing the ethical, social, and environmental concerns associated with genetic modification of microalgae is crucial for the responsible development and commercialization of microalgae-based products. This review summarizes the advancements of CRISPR-based bioengineering for production of industrially important biomolecules and provides key considerations to use CRISPR/Cas systems in microalgae. The review will help researchers to understand the progress and to initiate genome editing experiments in microalgae.

Indexed as

bioactivesbioengineeringbiomoleculesCRISPR/Cas9microalgaesynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID37965048
PMCPMC10641005
OpenAlexW4387953554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.