Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965010›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Multi-environment evaluation of rice genotypes: impact of weather and culm biochemical parameters against sheath blight infection.

Siddharth Panda, Naveen Kumar R, Lalitha Pavani S, Sangeetha Ganesan, Pawan Kumar Singh, Rameswar Prasad Sah, Padmakumar V, Hatanath Subudhi, Anumalla Mahender, Annamalai Anandan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Siddharth Panda *Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anushandhan (SOA) [Deemed to be University (DU)], Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Naveen Kumar R *Division of Plant Pathology, School of Agricultural Sciences, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Lalitha Pavani SInstitute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sangeetha GanesanIndian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru, India.
Pawan Kumar SinghInstitute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rameswar Prasad SahCrop Improvement Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) - National Rice Research Institute (NRRI), Cuttack, India.
Padmakumar VInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Hatanath SubudhiCrop Improvement Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) - National Rice Research Institute (NRRI), Cuttack, India.
Anumalla MahenderRice Breeding Innovation Platform, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
Annamalai AnandanCrop Improvement Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) - National Rice Research Institute (NRRI), Cuttack, India.
Jauhar AliRice Breeding Innovation Platform, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research · INBanaras Hindu University · INInternational Rice Research Institute · PHNational Institute of Plant Health Management · INSiksha O Anusandhan University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sheath blight caused by Material and methods: A multi-environment evaluation of 32 rice genotypes against sheath blight infection was conducted over six seasons across two locations (Agricultural Research Farm, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University (28.18° N, 38.03° E, and 75.5 masl), for four years during the wet seasons ( Result and discussion: The resistant genotypes across seasons were the ones with a higher hemicellulose content (13.93-14.64) and lower nitrogen content (1.10- 1.31) compared with the susceptible check Tapaswini (G32) (hemicellulose 12.96, nitrogen 1.38), which might explain the resistant reaction. Three different stability models-additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI), genotype + genotype x environment (GGE) biplot, and multi-trait stability index (MTSI)-were then used to identify the stable resistant genotypes across six seasons. The results obtained with all three models had common genotypes highlighted as stable and having a low area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) values. The ideal stable genotypes with low disease incidence were IC 283139 (G19), Tetep (G28), IC 260917 (G4), and IC 277274 (G10), with AUDPC values of 658.91, 607.46, 479.69, and 547.94, respectively. Weather parameters such as temperature, rainfall, sunshine hours, and relative humidity were also noted daily. Relative humidity was positively correlated with the percent disease index.

Indexed as

AMMIAUDPCcelluloseGGEhumidityMTSIPDIsheath blight

Identifiers

PMID37965010
PMCPMC10642295
OpenAlexW4388022522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.