Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964926›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2023

Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aruba Sohail, Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema, Maidah Sohail Mithani, Abia Shahid, Ahmad Nawaz, Alaa Hamza Hermis, Sampath Chinnam, Abdulqadir J Nashwan, Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda, Rehmat Ullah Awan and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Effects ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  4. Nutrients · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aruba Sohail *Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Maidah Sohail MithaniDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Abia ShahidDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ahmad NawazDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Alaa Hamza HermisNursing Department, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Hillah, Babylon, Iraq.
Sampath ChinnamDepartment of Chemistry, M. S. Ramaiah Institute of Technology (Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belgaum), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Abdulqadir J NashwanHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ivan Cherrez-OjedaRespiralab Research Center, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Rehmat Ullah AwanDepartment of Medicine, Ochsner Rush Medical Center, Meridian, MS, United States.
Sharjeel AhmadDepartment of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although numerous modalities are currently in use for the treatment and prophylaxis of COVID-19, probiotics are a cost-effective alternative that could be used in diverse clinical settings. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the role of probiotics in preventing and treating COVID-19 infection. Methods: We searched several databases from inception to 30 May 2023 for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies that evaluated probiotics (irrespective of the regimen) for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19. We conducted our meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 with risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) as the effect measures. Results: A total of 18 studies (11 RCTs and 7 observational studies) were included in our review. Probiotics reduced the risk of mortality (RR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.25-0.65, I Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis support the use of probiotics as an adjunct treatment for reducing the risk of mortality or improving other clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. However, probiotics are not useful as a prophylactic measure against COVID-19. Large-scale RCTs are still warranted for determining the most efficacious and safe probiotic strains. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023390275: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=390275).

Indexed as

COVID-19meta-analysisprobioticsSARS-CoV-2synbiotics

Identifiers

PMID37964926
PMCPMC10641770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.