Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964855›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Cyclic confining pressure and rock permeability: Mechanical compaction or fines migration.

Evgenii Vasilevich Kozhevnikov, Mikhail Sergeevich Turbakov, Evgenii Pavlovich Riabokon, Evgenii Aleksandrovich Gladkikh, Vladimir Valerevich Poplygin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evgenii Vasilevich KozhevnikovDepartment of Oil and Gas Technologies, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia.
Mikhail Sergeevich TurbakovDepartment of Oil and Gas Technologies, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia.
Evgenii Pavlovich RiabokonDepartment of Oil and Gas Technologies, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia.
Evgenii Aleksandrovich GladkikhDepartment of Oil and Gas Technologies, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia.
Vladimir Valerevich PoplyginDean of International Students Faculty, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The apparent rocks permeability, measured under cyclic loading, tends to constantly decrease with each subsequent loading/unloading cycle, the main reason for this, the researchers consider irreversible deformations. However, this understanding is not complete, as attention is not paid to the method of determining the permeability. Under cyclic loading, permeability is measured by fluid flow, which is able to carry colloids and they can clog pore throats and reduce permeability, but this is not taken into account in the study of porous rocks. Colloidal migration is also not taken into account in routine core tests, although colloids can significantly reduce the apparent permeability of rocks during migration. Also it is impossible to determine exactly which of the factors (mechanical compaction or colloid migration) contributed to the change in apparent permeability. The purpose of this research is to provide experimental evidence that under cyclic loading, permeability decreases not only due to mechanical compaction, but also due to colloid migration within the porous medium. For this task, a methodology has been developed, the feature of which is that between loading/unloading cycles, the core is blowning with a large pressure gradient. It has been established that under cyclic loading, the apparent permeability of rock samples changes as a result of colloid migration up to 20 %. The dynamics of permeability becomes unpredictable and weakly depends on the confining pressure when changing the direction and regime of the gas flow. At the end of the multi-cycle confining pressure test, the apparent permeability of 3 out of four core samples, despite the decrease during injection, recovered to the initial value which also confirms that the apparent permeability has affected by colloid migration. A mechanism for changing the apparent permeability during gas injection and cyclic confining pressure is proposed. The outcomes indicate that colloid migration should be taken into account during core tests not only in cyclic loading but also in routine coreflooding tests.

Indexed as

Carbonate rockColloid migrationConfinig pressureCorefloodingPermeability

Identifiers

PMID37964855
PMCPMC10641248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.