ArticleHeliyon2023
Estimating the impact of the outbreak of wars on financial assets: Evidence from Russia-Ukraine conflict.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study analyzes the performance of the Shanghai Composite Index, S&P 500 index, WTI oil price, and LBMA gold price when wars took place, especially the Russia-Ukraine conflict. We employ empirical methods to explore the stability, instantaneous shock, and short-term shock regarding the abovementioned financial assets. We first adopt the event study method to ascertain whether the cumulative abnormal returns of the selected assets are significant when wars break out. Then, we use the permutation test to examine the significance of price level changes. Results show that only the Shanghai Composite Index is relatively stable. Second, the difference-in-differences model indicates that the 3 unstable assets all suffered positive shocks in their price levels within several days after the Russia-Ukraine conflict broke out. The parallel trend test confirms the validity of establishing the difference-in-differences model. Third, regression discontinuity is designed to measure the impact in a longer event window, suggesting the robustness of conclusions of the difference-in-differences model and revealing an upward trend before the conflict and a downward trend after the conflict of the financial assets. The study suggests that investors consider adjustments to investment strategies and governments take precautions to diminish the risk of the outbreak of wars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.