ArticleCancer medicine2023
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes biomarkers guiding chemotherapy de-escalation in early triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Tumor-Infiltrating B Lymphocytes in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Immune Landscape Evolution.Cancers · 2025Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes biomarkers guiding chemotherapy de-escalation in early triple-negative breast cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo accelerate the clinical translation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) biomarkers for guiding chemotherapy de-escalation in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), cost-effectiveness evidence is essential but has not been investigated. We intend to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using TILs to guiding chemotherapy de-escalation in patients with early-stage TNBC from the perspective of the Chinese health service system.
methodsThe hybrid decision-tree-Markov model was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness of cytotoxic chemotherapy guided by whether TILs assay was performed in 50-year-old female patients with early-stage TNBC over a lifetime horizon. In Strategy (1), if TILs testing was performed, patients with TILs values exceeding 30% could be spared from chemotherapy. In Strategy (2), where no TILs testing was performed, all patients were administered chemotherapy following China's clinical practices. Based on the algorithm built by Guyot, the individual patient data were reconstructed from the published Kaplan-Meier curves, and the survival functions were calculated by parametric methods. Cost estimates were valued in Chinese yuan (as per rates in 2022).
resultsIn 50-year-old female patients with early-stage TNBC, Strategy (1), which employs TILs testing to guide cytotoxic chemotherapy yielded an additional 0.47 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and saved 40,976 yuan, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -87,182.98 yuan per QALY gained compared with Strategy (2). This indicates that compared with Strategy (2), Strategy (1) is the dominant scheme. The results were sensitive to utility parameters, discount rates, and treatment costs after relapse. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 85,700 yuan (based on GDP per capita) per QALY, the probability of TILs being cost-effective was almost 100%.
conclusionsThe application of biomarkers (TILs) to guide decisions for chemotherapy de-escalation is a cost-effective strategy for early-stage TNBC patients and deserves to be widely promoted in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.