Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964453›Full record

ArticleHealthcare informatics research2023

Requirements for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and its Application in Healthcare.

Myeongju Kim, Hyoju Sohn, Sookyung Choi, Sejoong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Myeongju KimHealthcare Innovation Park, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Hyoju SohnHealthcare Innovation Park, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sookyung ChoiHealthcare Innovation Park, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sejoong KimHealthcare Innovation Park, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

Institute of Information and communications Technology Planning and Evaluation 2022-0-00184Ministry of EducationMinistry of Health and WelfareMinistry of Science and ICTNational Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1F1A1060787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesArtificial intelligence (AI) technologies are developing very rapidly in the medical field, but have yet to be actively used in actual clinical settings. Ensuring reliability is essential to disseminating technologies, necessitating a wide range of research and subsequent social consensus on requirements for trustworthy AI.

methodsThis review divided the requirements for trustworthy medical AI into explainability, fairness, privacy protection, and robustness, investigated research trends in the literature on AI in healthcare, and explored the criteria for trustworthy AI in the medical field.

resultsExplainability provides a basis for determining whether healthcare providers would refer to the output of an AI model, which requires the further development of explainable AI technology, evaluation methods, and user interfaces. For AI fairness, the primary task is to identify evaluation metrics optimized for the medical field. As for privacy and robustness, further development of technologies is needed, especially in defending training data or AI algorithms against adversarial attacks.

conclusionsIn the future, detailed standards need to be established according to the issues that medical AI would solve or the clinical field where medical AI would be used. Furthermore, these criteria should be reflected in AI-related regulations, such as AI development guidelines and approval processes for medical devices.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGuidelineHealthcare DisparityMachine LearningTrust

Identifiers

PMID37964453
PMCPMC10651407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.