Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964431›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2024

Evaluating the effects of nicotine concentration on the appeal and nicotine delivery of oral nicotine pouches among rural and Appalachian adults who smoke cigarettes: A randomized cross-over study.

Brittney Keller-Hamilton, Mahmood A Alalwan, Hayley Curran, Alice Hinton, Lauren Long, Kirsten Chrzan, Theodore L Wagener, Leanne Atkinson, Sriya Suraapaneni, Darren Mays

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05236894 (Examining the Appeal of Nicotine Pouches in Ohio Appalachia), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05236894 early_phase1completednot on this map

Examining the Appeal of Nicotine Pouches in Ohio Appalachia

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled55ConditionsCigarette Smoking-Related CarcinomaArmsCigarette Smoking, Nicotine Oral Pouch, Questionnaire Administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Evaluating the Role of Nicotine Stereoisomer on Nicotine Pouch Abuse Liability: A Randomized Crossover Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Association Between Product Attributes and Oral Nicotine Pouch Preference-Evidence From Online Stores.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  9. Oral Nicotine Pouch Misuse Popularized Online Raises Concerns.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  10. Investigating the Appeal of Nicotine Pouch Packaging, Flavour, and Nicotine Descriptors Among Adults in the UK: An Online Experiment.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Nicotine Toxicity From Repeat Use of Nicotine Pouches.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  20. The Potential Impact of Oral Nicotine Pouches on Public Health: A Scoping Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brittney Keller-HamiltonThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8574-7263
Mahmood A AlalwanCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Hayley CurranCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Alice HintonCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Lauren LongCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kirsten ChrzanCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Theodore L WagenerThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4028-0081
Leanne AtkinsonCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sriya SuraapaneniCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Darren MaysThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
The Ohio State University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (OSU-TCORS)U54CA287392 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Peter G. Shields, Theodore Lee Wagener · 2023 to 2026
$19.5M
Effects of tobacco cut and nicotine form on the abuse liability of moist snuffK01DA055696 · NIDA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Brittney L Keller-Hamilton · 2023 to 2026
$712k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS U54 CA287392NCI NIH HHS U54CA287392NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA055696NIDA NIH HHS K01DA055696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsOral nicotine pouches (ONPs) probably offer reduced harm compared with cigarettes, but independent data concerning their misuse liability are lacking. We compared nicotine delivery and craving relief from ONPs with different nicotine concentrations to cigarettes.

designThis was a single-blind, three-visit (≥ 48-hour washout), randomized-cross-over study. Participants were encouraged to complete all study visits in less than 1 month.

settingThe study took place in Rural/Appalachian Ohio.

participantsParticipants comprised 30 adults who smoke cigarettes. Participants (mean

interventionParticipants who were ≥ 12-hour tobacco-abstinent used: (1) a 3-mg nicotine concentration ONP, (2) a 6-mg nicotine concentration ONP and (3) usual brand cigarette in separate visits. ONPs (wintergreen Zyn) were used for 30 minutes; cigarettes were puffed every 30 sec for 5 minutes. MEASUREMENTS: Plasma nicotine and self-reported craving were assessed at t = 0, 5, 15, 30, 60 and 90 minutes. The primary outcome was plasma nicotine concentration at t = 30 minutes. A secondary outcome was craving relief at t = 5 minutes.

findingsAt t = 30, mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] plasma nicotine was 9.5 ng/ml (95% CI = 7.1, 11.9 ng/ml) for the 3 mg nicotine ONP, 17.5 ng/ml (95% CI = 13.7, 21.3) for the 6 mg nicotine ONP and 11.4 ng/ml (95% CI = 9.2, 13.6 ng/ml) for the cigarette. Mean plasma nicotine at t = 30 minutes differed between the 3- and 6-mg nicotine ONPs (P = 0.001) and between the 6-mg nicotine ONP and cigarette (P = 0.002). Mean (95% CI) craving at t = 5 minutes was lower for the cigarette (mean = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.61, 1.39) than either the 3 mg (mean = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.68, 2.82; P < 0.0001) or 6 mg nicotine (mean = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.60, 2.79; P < 0.0001) ONP.

conclusionsAmong adult smokers, using 6-mg nicotine concentration oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) was associated with greater plasma nicotine delivery at 30 minutes than 3-mg ONPs or cigarettes, but neither ONP relieved craving symptoms at 5 minutes as strongly as a cigarette. Accelerating the speed of nicotine delivery in ONPs might increase their misuse liability relative to cigarettes.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsAdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNicotineSingle-Blind MethodNicotineCigaretteshealth disparitiesmisuse liabilitynicotineoral nicotine pouchesrural

Identifiers

PMID37964431
PMCPMC10872395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.