Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964390›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2023

Efficacy of either orally administered fluralaner or topically administered imidacloprid/flumethrin for controlling Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato premises infestations.

Marcelo Bahia Labruna, Juliana Salomão Doretto, Olivia Carmen de Araújo Nascimento, Francisco Bonomi Barufi, Simone Cristina Rosa, Germana Vizzotto Osowski, Jason Drake, Rob Armstrong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcelo Bahia LabrunaParasitic Disease Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliana Salomão DorettoCentro de Pesquisa de Animais do Brasil, Santo Antônio de Posse, Brazil.
Olivia Carmen de Araújo NascimentoCentro de Pesquisa de Animais do Brasil, Santo Antônio de Posse, Brazil.
Francisco Bonomi BarufiMSD Animal Health, São Paulo, Brazil.
Simone Cristina RosaMSD Animal Health, São Paulo, Brazil.
Germana Vizzotto OsowskiLaboratory of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jason DrakeMerck Animal Health, Rahway, NJ, 07940, USA. jason.drake@merck.com.
Rob ArmstrongMerck Animal Health, Rahway, NJ, 07940, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USMicrosoft (Brazil) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdult, nymph, and larval Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato infest dogs and thrive in premises including homes and kennels. Ticks emerge from hiding to seek and attach to dogs, engorge, then leave their hosts to hide then molt or oviposit. This study evaluated the effect of either external or systemic canine treatment on R. sanguineus s.l. populations in premises.

methodsThirty-two dogs in eight kennels were divided into three groups; one group (eight dogs in two kennels) served as untreated controls; one group (12 dogs in three kennels) received oral fluralaner (25-56 mg/kg); and one group (12 dogs in three kennels) received topical flumethrin/imidacloprid impregnated collars. Treatments were administered once on day 0. Prior to treatment, R. sanguineus s.l. infestations were established in kennels holding dogs, by placing ticks every 2 weeks from day -84 through day -14. Kennel surfaces (walls and floors) were smooth except for uniform "hideouts" to permit precise off-host tick counting.

resultsControl dog kennel mean tick counts (all life stages) increased from 737 ticks/kennel at day -7 to 2213 at day 63 when all control kennel dogs were acaricide-treated as a humane endpoint. Kennels housing dogs subsequently treated with systemic fluralaner had a mean of 637 counted ticks/kennel on study day -7 (7 days before treatment). One fluralaner treatment eliminated all premises ticks (100% reduction) by day 70, and these kennels remained tick-free through study completion (day 84). Kennels housing dogs subsequently treated with an external imidacloprid/flumethrin collar had a mean of 614 counted ticks/kennel at study day -7. Collar treatment reduced counts by 90% on day 63, with kennel tick counts climbing after this and ending the study with a 75% reduction. Systemic fluralaner treatment was significantly (P = 0.003) more effective at reducing engorged adult female tick counts than external imidacloprid/flumethrin treatment.

conclusionsFluralaner treatment eliminated off-host R. sanguineus life stages in infested kennels by day 70 following treatment and was significantly more effective than imidacloprid/flumethrin collar treatment in reducing the premises population of engorged female ticks. Imidacloprid/flumethrin treatment did not eliminate premises tick populations, with populations increasing before the study end.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesIsoxazolesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsPyrethrinsRhipicephalus sanguineusTick InfestationsAnimalsDogsFemaleA1443 compoundflumethrinimidaclopridIsoxazolesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsPyrethrinsAcaricideDogFlumethrinFluralanerRhipicephalus

Identifiers

PMID37964390
PMCPMC10647063
OpenAlexW4388658430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.