Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964361›Full record

Trial reportScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2023

From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching.

Elonka Bergmans, Alistair Billington, Karl-Christian Thies

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Elonka BergmansKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv-, Notfallmedizin, Transfusionsmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Ev. Klinikum Bethel, Universitätsklinikum OWL der Universität Bielefeld, Campus Bielefeld, Bethel, Burgstieg 13, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany. elonka.bergmans@evkb.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2878-3501
Alistair BillingtonEuropean Trauma Course Organisation, PO Box 452, Market Drayton, TF9 9FB, UK.
Karl-Christian ThiesKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv-, Notfallmedizin, Transfusionsmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Ev. Klinikum Bethel, Universitätsklinikum OWL der Universität Bielefeld, Campus Bielefeld, Bethel, Burgstieg 13, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bielefeld University · DEUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis experimental study was performed to evaluate the role of blended learning for technical skill teaching on the European Trauma Course (ETC). While online modules are extensively used for theoretical teaching, their role in skills training remains less well explored. The ETC currently relies on the established 4-step technique for teaching technical skills. However, the required large cohort of skilled instructors and the time intensity prove increasingly challenging in a current climate of staff shortages and funding constraints. This study assesses if blended learning, combining pre-course online elements with face-to-face training matches the effectiveness of the traditional 4-step approach whilst being more time-efficient.

methodsIn a randomised, multi-centre trial, the conventional face-to-face 4-step technique for teaching a skill of medium complexity, the application of a pelvic binder, was compared with an innovative blended approach. It was hypothesised that the blended approach was non-inferior for skill performance measured after the teaching session and after two days (skill retention) with the time needed for teaching and student/teacher satisfaction as secondary outcomes.

resultsNinety participants, divided into 44 traditional and 46 blended method students, were analysed. Independent-samples t-test showed no significant difference in performance scores and non-inferiority of the blended approach with a half of one standard deviation margin. A statistically significant difference in mean retention scores favored the blended approach. A Mann-Whitney U Test revealed no significant difference in candidate satisfaction levels but a statistically significant difference in instructors' satisfaction levels in favour of the blended approach. Analysis with Welch' t-test demonstrated that the face-to-face teaching time needed for the blended approach was significantly shorter (by 6 min).

conclusionsThe integration of a blended approach with the 4-step technique for teaching pelvic binder application in the ETC streamlined teaching without compromising skill acquisition quality. This innovative approach addresses traditional limitations and shows promise in adapting medical education to modern learning and teaching demands. We suggest that blended learning could also be applied for other skills taught on life support courses.

trial registrationUniversity of Dundee (Schools of Medicine and Life sciences Research Ethics Committee, REC number 22/59, 28th June 2022).

Indexed as

Education, MedicalLearningCurriculumEducational MeasurementHumansStudentsTeaching4 step techniqueBlended learningFlipped classroomPelvic binder

Identifiers

PMID37964361
PMCPMC10644658
OpenAlexW4388657171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.