Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964286›Full record

ReviewHarm reduction journal2023

A rapid review of current engagement strategies with people who use drugs in monitoring and reporting on substance use-related harms.

Melissa Perri, Triti Khorasheh, David Edward-Ooi Poon, Nat Kaminski, Sean LeBlanc, Leticia Mizon, Ashley Smoke, Carol Strike, Pamela Leece

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Harm reduction journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa PerriDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Triti KhorashehHealth Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
David Edward-Ooi PoonDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Nat KaminskiOntario Network of People Who Use Drugs, ON, Canada.
Sean LeBlancOntario Network of People Who Use Drugs, ON, Canada.
Leticia MizonOntario Network of People Who Use Drugs, ON, Canada.
Ashley SmokeOntario Network of People Who Use Drugs, ON, Canada.
Carol StrikeDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Pamela LeeceDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada. Pamela.Leece@oahpp.ca.
Public Health Ontario · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Canadian drug supply has significantly increased in toxicity over the past few years, resulting in the worsening of the overdose crisis. A key initiative implemented during this crisis has been data monitoring and reporting of substance use-related harms (SRH). This literature review aims to: (1) identify strategies used for the meaningful engagement of people who use drugs (PWUD) in local, provincial, and national SRH data system planning, reporting, and action and (2) describe data monitoring and reporting strategies and common indicators of SRH within those systems.

methodsWe searched three academic and five gray literature databases for relevant literature published between 2012 and 2022. Team members who identify as PWUD and a librarian at Public Health Ontario developed search strings collaboratively. Two reviewers screened all search results and applied the eligibility criteria. We used Microsoft Excel for data management.

resultsTwenty-two articles met our eligibility criteria (peer-reviewed n = 10 and gray literature reports n = 12); most used qualitative methods and focused on the Canadian context (n = 20). There were few examples of PWUD engaged as authors of reports on SRH monitoring. Among information systems involving PWUD, we found two main strategies: (1) community-based strategies (e.g., word of mouth, through drug sellers, and through satellite workers) and (2) public health-based data monitoring and communication strategies (e.g., communicating drug quality and alerts to PWUD). Substance use-related mortality, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits were the indicators most commonly used in systems of SRH reporting that engaged PWUD.

conclusionThis review demonstrates limited engagement of PWUD and silos of activity in existing SRH data monitoring and reporting strategies. Future work is needed to better engage PWUD in these processes in an equitable manner. Building SRH monitoring systems in partnership with PWUD may increase the potential impact of these systems to reduce harms in the community.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseSubstance-Related DisordersHospitalizationHumansOntarioPublic HealthCommunity engagementData monitoringData reportingInformation systemsOpioidsOverdose crisisPeople who use drugsSubstance use-related harm

Identifiers

PMID37964286
PMCPMC10648706
OpenAlexW4388656139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.