Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964238›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2023

How do navigation programs address the needs of those living in the community with advanced, life-limiting Illness? A realist evaluation of programs in Canada.

Robin Urquhart, Cynthia Kendell, Kathryn Pfaff, Kelli Stajduhar, Linda Patrick, Carren Dujela, Sarah Scruton, Faith Fauteux, Grace Warner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robin UrquhartDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Room 413, Halifax, NS, Canada. robin.urquhart@nshealth.ca.
Cynthia KendellDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Kathryn PfaffFaculty of Nursing, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.
Kelli StajduharSchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Linda PatrickFaculty of Nursing, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.
Carren DujelaSchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Sarah ScrutonDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Room 413, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Faith FauteuxFaculty of Nursing, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.
Grace WarnerSchool of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAUniversity of Windsor · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

CIHR HCI-160002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to identify innovative navigation programs across Canadian jurisdictions that target their services to individuals affected by life-limiting illness and their families, and articulate the principal components of these programs that enable them to address the needs of their clients who are living in the community.

methodsThis realist evaluation used a two-phased approach. First, we conducted a horizon scan of innovative community-based navigation programs across Canadian jurisdictions to identify innovative community-based navigation programs that aim to address the needs of community-dwelling individuals affected by life-limiting illness. Second, we conducted semi-structured interviews with key informants from each of the selected programs. Informants included individuals responsible for managing and delivering the program and decision-makers with responsibility and/or oversight of the program. Analyses proceeded in an iterative manner, consistent with realist evaluation methods. This included iteratively developing and refining Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configurations, and developing the final program theory.

resultsTwenty-seven navigation programs were identified from the horizon scan. Using specific eligibility criteria, 11 programs were selected for subsequent interviews and in-depth examination. Twenty-three participants were interviewed from these programs, which operated in five Canadian provinces. The programs represented a mixture of community (non-profit or volunteer), research-initiated, and health system programs. The final program theory was articulated as: navigation programs can improve client outcomes if they have supported and empowered staff who have the time and flexibility to personalize care to the needs of their clients.

conclusionsThe findings highlight key principles (contexts and mechanisms) that enable navigation programs to develop client relationships, personalize care to client needs, and improve client outcomes. These principles include staff (or volunteer) knowledge and experience to coordinate health and social services, having a point of contact after hours, and providing staff (and volunteers) time and flexibility to develop relationships and respond to individualized client needs. These findings may be used by healthcare organizations - outside of navigation programs - to work towards more person-centred care.

Indexed as

Palliative CareSocial WorkCanadaHumansPatient-Centered CareNavigationPalliative careRealist evaluation

Identifiers

PMID37964238
PMCPMC10647106
OpenAlexW4388703961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.