Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964225›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Data management in the digital health environment scale development study.

Hasan Fehmi Demirci, Elif Dikmetaş Yardan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hasan Fehmi DemirciOndokuz Mayıs University, Health Sciences Faculty Department of Healthcare Management, OMÜ Kurupelit Campus, Samsun, Türkiye, Atakum, 55200. demircihasanfehmi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5223-8318
Elif Dikmetaş YardanOndokuz Mayıs University, Health Sciences Faculty Department of Healthcare Management, OMÜ Kurupelit Campus, Samsun, Türkiye, Atakum, 55200.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8300-8715

Funding

Ondokuz Mayıs University Scientific Research Project Unit PYO.SBF.1904.21.006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to develop a scale that measures individuals' perceptions of privacy, security, use, sharing, benefit and satisfaction in the digital health environment.

methodWithin the scope of the study, in the scale development process; The stages of literature review, creation of items, getting expert opinion, conducting a pilot study, ensuring construct and criterion validity, and reliability analyses were carried out. The literature was searched for the formation of the question items. To evaluate the created question items, expert opinion was taken, and the question items were arranged according to the feedback from the experts. In line with the study's purpose and objectives, the focus group consisted of individuals aged 18 and above within the community. The convenience sampling method was employed for sample selection. Data were collected using an online survey conducted through Google Forms. Before commencing the survey, participants were briefed on the research's content. A pilot study was conducted with 30 participants, and as a result of the feedback from the participants, eliminations were made in the question items and the scale was made ready for application. The research was conducted by reference to 812 participants in the community. Expert evaluations of the question items were obtained, and a pilot study was conducted. A sociodemographic information form, a scale developed by the researcher, Norman and Skinner's e-Health Literacy Scale, and the Mobile Health and Personal Health Record Management Scale were used as data collection tools.

resultsThe content validity of the research was carried out by taking expert opinions and conducting a pilot study. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed to ensure construct validity. The total variance explained by the scale was 60.43%. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 20-Item 5-factor structure exhibited good fit values. According to the analysis of criterion validity, there are significant positive correlations among the Data Management in the Digital Health Environment Scale, Norman and Skinner's e-Health Literacy Scale and the Mobile Health and Personal Health Record Management Scale (p < 0.01; r = .669, .378). The Cronbach's alpha value of the scale is .856, and the test-retest reliability coefficient is .909.

conclusionThe Data Management in the Digital Health Environment Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool that measures individuals' perceptions of privacy, security, use, sharing, benefit and satisfaction in the digital health environment.

Indexed as

Data ManagementPersonal SatisfactionHumansPilot ProjectsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesData managementDigitalFactor analysisHealthMeasurement toolScale development

Identifiers

PMID37964225
PMCPMC10644523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.