Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964200›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2023

Neural oscillatory activity and connectivity in children who stutter during a non-speech motor task.

Valeria C Caruso, Amanda Hampton Wray, Erica Lescht, Soo-Eun Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of central auditory processing skills in children with stuttering.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. An active inference account of stuttering behavior.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Valeria C CarusoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. vcaruso@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3895-1296
Amanda Hampton WrayDepartment of Communication Science & Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Erica LeschtDepartment of Communication Science & Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Soo-Eun ChangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USEwha Womans University · KRUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Sexual dimorphism of neural development underlying childhood stutteringR01DC011277 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Soo-Eun Chang · 2010 to 2026
$8.2M
Neural oscillations underlying speech perception and production in childhood stutteringR01DC018283 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHANG, SOO-EUN · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
Supplement to Attentional control in children who stutterR21DC017227 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HAMPTON WRAY, AMANDA M · 2018 to 2021
$501k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011277NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018283NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC018283NIDCD NIH HHS R21DC015875NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeural motor control rests on the dynamic interaction of cortical and subcortical regions, which is reflected in the modulation of oscillatory activity and connectivity in multiple frequency bands. Motor control is thought to be compromised in developmental stuttering, particularly involving circuits in the left hemisphere that support speech, movement initiation, and timing control. However, to date, evidence comes from adult studies, with a limited understanding of motor processes in childhood, closer to the onset of stuttering.

methodsWe investigated the neural control of movement initiation in children who stutter and children who do not stutter by evaluating transient changes in EEG oscillatory activity (power, phase locking to button press) and connectivity (phase synchronization) during a simple button press motor task. We compared temporal changes in these oscillatory dynamics between the left and right hemispheres and between children who stutter and children who do not stutter, using mixed-model analysis of variance.

resultsWe found reduced modulation of left hemisphere oscillatory power, phase locking to button press and phase connectivity in children who stutter compared to children who do not stutter, consistent with previous findings of dysfunction within the left sensorimotor circuits. Interhemispheric connectivity was weaker at lower frequencies (delta, theta) and stronger in the beta band in children who stutter than in children who do not stutter.

conclusionsTaken together, these findings indicate weaker engagement of the contralateral left motor network in children who stutter even during low-demand non-speech tasks, and suggest that the right hemisphere might be recruited to support sensorimotor processing in childhood stuttering. Differences in oscillatory dynamics occurred despite comparable task performance between groups, indicating that an altered balance of cortical activity might be a core aspect of stuttering, observable during normal motor behavior.

Indexed as

StutteringAdultChildHumansSpeechBeta oscillationsEEGMotor processingNeural oscillationsStuttering

Identifiers

PMID37964200
PMCPMC10647051
OpenAlexW4388703771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.