Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964135›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2024

The effects of contemporary treatment of DCIS on the risk of developing an ipsilateral invasive Breast cancer (iIBC) in the Dutch population.

Sena Alaeikhanehshir, Renée S J M Schmitz, Alexandra W van den Belt-Dusebout, Frederieke H van Duijnhoven, Ellen Verschuur, Maartje van Seijen, Michael Schaapveld, Esther H Lips, Jelle Wesseling, and Grand Challenge PRECISION Consortium

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk perception of patients with ductal carcinomaHistology and histopathology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sena AlaeikhanehshirDivision of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5535-1703
Renée S J M SchmitzDivision of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands.
Alexandra W van den Belt-DuseboutDivision of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands.
Frederieke H van DuijnhovenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ellen VerschuurBorstkanker Vereniging Nederland, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maartje van SeijenDivision of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands.
Michael SchaapveldDepartment of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Esther H LipsDivision of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands.
Jelle WesselingDivision of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands. j.wesseling@nki.nl.
and Grand Challenge PRECISION Consortium
Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital · NLBorstkankervereniging Nederland · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding C38317/A24043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the effects of contemporary treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on the risk of developing an ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC) in the Dutch female population.

methodsClinical data was obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), a nationwide registry of all primary malignancies in the Netherlands integrated with the data from PALGA, the Dutch nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands, on all women in the Netherlands treated for primary DCIS from 2005 to 2015, resulting in a population-based cohort of 14.419 women. Cumulative iIBC incidence was assessed and associations of DCIS treatment type with subsequent iIBC risk were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression analyses.

resultsTen years after DCIS diagnosis, the cumulative incidence of iIBC was 3.1% (95% CI: 2.6-3.5%) in patients treated by breast conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy (RT), 7.1% (95% CI: 5.5-9.1) in patients treated by BCS alone, and 1.6% (95% CI: 1.3-2.1) in patients treated by mastectomy. BCS was associated with a significantly higher risk for iIBC compared to BCS + RT during the first 5 years after treatment (HR 2.80, 95% CI: 1.91-4.10%). After 5 years of follow-up, the iIBC risk declined in the BCS alone group but remained higher than the iIBC risk in the BCS + RT group (HR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.15-2.61).

conclusionsAlthough absolute risks of iIBC were low in patients treated for DCIS with either BCS or BCS + RT, risks remained higher in the BCS alone group compared to patients treated with BCS + RT for at least 10 years after DCIS diagnosis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansIncidenceMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBreast cancer-screeningDuctal carcinoma in situInvasive breast cancerPopulation-based cohort studyRadiotherapySurgery

Identifiers

PMID37964135
PMCPMC10806034
OpenAlexW4388653136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.