ArticleUpdates in surgery2024
Postmastectomy dual-plane submuscular-subcutaneous implant-based reconstruction: a series of 100 consecutive patients.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reverse Submammary Adipofascial Perforator Flap: Preliminary Results of a Dual-plane, Acellular Dermal Matrix-free, Direct-to-implant Hybrid Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in cancer knowledge and surgical techniques over the last decades have enabled plastic surgeons to use muscle-sparing procedures and more conservative approaches for implant-based reconstructions. In this paper, the authors describe an innovative subpectoral/subcutaneous implant pocket that represents an evolution of the classical submuscular technique and they report on the first consecutive hundred patients undergoing this procedure.
methodsBetween April 2019 and May 2022, 100 consecutive patients underwent immediate postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction using the subpectoral/subcutaneous space, for a total of 122 procedures. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed and patients were prospectively followed. During plastic consultations, medical photographs were taken and aesthetic outcomes were scored with patients.
resultsMean follow-up was 18 months (range 6-46). Implant loss was observed in two patients (2%). Early minor complications were registered in 19 patients. A total of 80 out of 100 patients completed satisfaction survey assessing their postoperative outcomes. Results were considered satisfactory or very satisfactory by the surgeons and patients in more than 90% of cases.
conclusionThe submuscular/subcutaneous pocket can be considered a new tool in the armamentarium of reconstructive procedures, in between submuscular/subfascial procedures and prepectoral ones. It is a one-stage procedure, its a simple and short time surgery, reproducible, its very well accepted by patients. It has specific indications, advantages, and drawbacks, a careful indication and an accurate surgical technique are mandatory to achieve good results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.