Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37964046›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023

[The importance of guidelines in dentistry and dental education].

Sebastian Krohn, Ina B Kopp, Peter Proff

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sebastian KrohnPoliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland. sebastian.krohn@ukr.de.
Ina B KoppArbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF), Berlin, Deutschland.
Peter ProffPoliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based treatment recommendations are gaining importance within the framework of both medical and dental quality management systems. The scientific findings, which have been evaluated critically by expert committees with regard to their methodological quality, are summarized in easy-to-understand guidelines. All guidelines are evaluated qualitatively in accordance with a balance between consensus and evidence during the drafting process regarding their stages of scientific development. The publication of guidelines and the coordination of guideline development has been carried out by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) since its foundation in the 1960s. Forty-four dental guidelines are currently available, which are mostly rated at the highest level (S3) of scientific development. Therefore, recommendations for various treatment protocols are defined for both dental staff at university sites or practices and the implementation of these guidelines into the daily clinical routine is desirable. Poor acceptance and adverse resource requirements are major limitations of the establishment of guidelines with regard to the expansion of evidence-based dentistry. However, these limitations might be overcome by the introduction of basic scientific training within dental universities and increased funding of young researchers in order to ensure high treatment quality and economy in dentistry in the future. Guidelines can facilitate education by providing scientifically validated procedural templates to dental students and assisting educators in meeting the requirements of practical skills.

Indexed as

DentistryEducation, DentalGermanyHumansAssociation of Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF)ConsensusDental educationEvidence-based dentistryGuidelines

Identifiers

PMID37964046
PMCPMC10667131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.