ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Biomechanics of thoracic wall instability].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- From rib fixation to dynamic chest wall reconstruction: historical lessons for modern surgical stabilization of rib fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Review
- Rapid sequence versus early surgical stabilization of severe chest wall injuries: a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter trauma registry.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic injuries of the thorax can entail thoracic wall instability (flail chest), which can affect both the shape of the thorax and the mechanics of respiration; however, so far little is known about the biomechanics of the unstable thoracic wall and the optimal surgical fixation. This review article summarizes the current state of research regarding experimental models and previous findings. The thoracic wall is primarily burdened by complex muscle and compression forces during respiration and the mechanical coupling to spinal movement. Previous experimental models focused on the burden caused by respiration, but are mostly not validated, barely established, and severely limited with respect to the simulation of physiologically occurring forces. Nevertheless, previous results suggested that osteosynthesis of an unstable thoracic wall is essential from a biomechanical point of view to restore the native respiratory mechanics, thoracic shape and spinal stability. Moreover, in vitro studies also showed better stabilizing properties of plate osteosynthesis compared to intramedullary splints, wires or screws. The optimum number and selection of ribs to be fixated for the different types of thoracic wall instability is still unknown from a biomechanical perspective. Future biomechanical investigations should simulate respiratory and spinal movement by means of validated models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.