ArticleScientific reports2023
Enhanced CO
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moderately Flexible Copper-Triazolate Framework with Quinone-Based Linkers: Balancing Effective CO2 Capture and Low-Energy Regeneration.Inorganic chemistry · 2026Article
- Metal-Organic Frameworks for CONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Advancing Arsenic Water Treatment Using UiO-66 and Its Functionalized Metal-Organic Framework Analogs.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Current Progress in Advanced Functional Membranes for Water-Pollutant Removal: A Critical Review.Membranes · 2025Review
- Recovery of Au(III) from electronic waste using solid phase extraction based on a magnetic nanobiocomposite, OCBs@FeMikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- Mechanochemical Synthesis of Graphene Oxide/UiO-66-NHACS omega · 2025Article
- Article
- Revolutionizing environmental cleanup: the evolution of MOFs as catalysts for pollution remediation.RSC advances · 2024Review
- Experimental, RSM modelling, and DFT simulation of COScientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- MOFs for next-generation cancer therapeutics through a biophysical approach-a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The excessive release of greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide (CO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.