ArticleScientific reports2023
Image denoising and segmentation model construction based on IWOA-PCNN.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wild horseshoe crab image denoising based on CNN-transformer architecture.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An alternating multiple residual Wasserstein regularization model for Gaussian image denoising.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The research suggests a method to improve the present pulse coupled neural network (PCNN), which has a complex structure and unsatisfactory performance in image denoising and image segmentation. Then, a multi strategy collaborative improvement whale optimization algorithm (WOA) is proposed, and an improved whale optimization algorithm (IWOA) is constructed. IWOA is used to find the optimal parameter values of PCNN to optimize PCNN. By combining the aforementioned components, the IWOA-PCNN model had the best image denoising performance, and the produced images were crisper and preserve more information. IWOA-PCNN processed pictures have an average PSNR of 35.87 and an average MSE of 0.24. The average processing time for photos with noise is typically 24.80 s, which is 7.30 s and 7.76 s faster than the WTGAN and IGA-NLM models, respectively. Additionally, the average NU value measures 0.947, and the average D value exceeds 1000. The aforementioned findings demonstrate that the suggested method can successfully enhance the PCNN, improving its capability for image denoising and image segmentation. This can, in part, encourage the use and advancement of the PCNN.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.