Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37963761›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Neural Representations of Post-Decision Accuracy and Reward Expectation in the Caudate Nucleus and Frontal Eye Field.

Yunshu Fan, Takahiro Doi, Joshua I Gold, Long Ding

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Bats as instructive animal models for studying longevity and aging.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Neural basis of reward expectancy inducing proactive aggression.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yunshu FanNeuroscience Graduate Group, Departments of Neuroscience.
Takahiro DoiPsychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-9650-972X
Joshua I GoldNeuroscience Graduate Group, Departments of Neuroscience.
Long DingNeuroscience Graduate Group, Departments of Neuroscience lding@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1716-3848
Society for Neuroscience · USNeurosciences Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Qi N Cui · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
Role of basal ganglia in reward-biased visual decisionsR01EY022411 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DING, LONG, GOLD, JOSHUA I · 2013 to 2023
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performance monitoring that supports ongoing behavioral adjustments is often examined in the context of either choice confidence for perceptual decisions (i.e., "did I get it right?") or reward expectation for reward-based decisions (i.e., "what reward will I receive?"). However, our understanding of how the brain encodes these distinct evaluative signals remains limited because they are easily conflated, particularly in commonly used two-alternative tasks with symmetric rewards for correct choices. Previously we used a motion-discrimination task with asymmetric rewards to identify neural substrates of forming reward-biased perceptual decisions in the caudate nucleus (part of the striatum in the basal ganglia) and the frontal eye field (FEF, in prefrontal cortex). Here we leveraged this task design to partially decouple estimates of accuracy and reward expectation and examine their impacts on subsequent decisions and their representations in those two brain areas. We identified distinguishable representations of these two evaluative signals in individual caudate and FEF neurons, with regional differences in their distribution patterns and time courses. We observed that well-trained monkeys (both sexes) used both evaluative signals, infrequently but consistently, to adjust their subsequent decisions. We found further that these behavioral adjustments had reliable relationships with the neural representations of both evaluative signals in caudate, but not FEF. These results suggest that the cortico-striatal decision network may use diverse evaluative signals to monitor and adjust decision-making behaviors, adding to our understanding of the different roles that the FEF and caudate nucleus play in a diversity of decision-related computations.

Indexed as

Caudate NucleusMotivationAnimalsDecision MakingFemaleFrontal LobeMaleRewardbasal gangliadecision evaluationfrontal cortexperceptual decision makingsaccadestriatum

Identifiers

PMID37963761
PMCPMC10860634
OpenAlexW4388667022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.