Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37963688›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Impact of an in-consult patient decision aid on treatment choices and outcomes of management for patients with an endoscopically resected malignant colorectal polyp: a study protocol for a non-randomised clinical phase II study.

Helene Juul Würtz, Hans Bjarke Rahr, Jan Lindebjerg, Adrian Edwards, Karina Dahl Steffensen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05776381 (The Impact of an In-consultation Patient Decision Aid on Treatment Choices and Outcomes of Management for Patients With an Unexpected Malignant Colorectal Polyp A Non-randomized Clinical Phase II Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05776381 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2028, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of an In-consultation Patient Decision Aid on Treatment Choices and Outcomes of Management for Patients With an Unexpected Malignant Colorectal Polyp A Non-randomized Clinical Phase II Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorVejle HospitalRan2028 to 2033Enrolled110ConditionsShared Decision Making, Colonic Polyp, Decision Aids, Rectal PolypArmsShared Decision Making using a Patient Decision Aid.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helene Juul WürtzCenter for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark helene.j.w@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9430-0084
Hans Bjarke RahrDepartment of Surgery at Vejle Hospital, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Jan LindebjergInstitute of Regional Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Adrian EdwardsDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6228-4446
Karina Dahl SteffensenCenter for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKCardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionManagement of an endoscopically resected malignant colorectal polyps can be challenging due to the risk of residual tumour and lymphatic spread. International studies have shown, that of those choosing surgical management instead of surveillance strategy, there are between 54% and 82% of bowel resections without evidence of residual tumour or lymphatic spread. As surgical management entails risks of complications and surveillance strategy entails risks of residual tumour or recurrence, a clinical dilemma arises when choosing a management strategy. Shared decision-making is a concept that can be used in preference-sensitive decision-making to facilitate patient involvement and empowerment to facilitate active patient participation in the decision-making process. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol describes our clinical multi-institutional, non-randomised, interventional phase II study at Danish surgical departments planned to commence in the second quarter of 2024. The aim of this study is to examine whether shared decision-making and using a patient decision aid in consultations affect patients' choice of management, comparing with retrospective data. The secondary aim is to investigate patients' experiences, perceived involvement, satisfaction, decision conflict and other outcomes using questionnaire feedback directly from the patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: There are no conflicts of interest for principal or local investigators in any of the study sites. All results will be published at Danish and international meetings, and in English language scientific peer-reviewed journals. Our study underwent evaluation by the Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (file number 20232000-47), concluding that formal approval was not required for this kind of research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05776381.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsClinical Trials as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm, ResidualPatient ParticipationReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesClinical Decision-MakingColorectal surgeryDecision MakingGastrointestinal tumoursPatient-Centered CarePatient Reported Outcome Measures

Identifiers

PMID37963688
PMCPMC10649383
OpenAlexW4388673815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.