Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37963557›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2023

Rapid flapping and fibre-reinforced membrane wings are key to high-performance bat flight.

Marin Lauber, Gabriel D Weymouth, Georges Limbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marin LauberFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2191-9318
Gabriel D WeymouthFaculty of Mechanical Maritime and Materials Engineering (3mE), Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5080-5016
Georges LimbertFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4268-6106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bats fly using significantly different wing motions from other fliers, stemming from the complex interplay of their membrane wings' motion and structural properties. Biological studies show that many bats fly at Strouhal numbers, the ratio of flapping to flight speed, 50-150% above the range typically associated with optimal locomotion. We use high-resolution fluid-structure interaction simulations of a bat wing to independently study the role of kinematics and material/structural properties in aerodynamic performance and show that peak propulsive and lift efficiencies for a bat-like wing motion require flapping 66% faster than for a symmetric motion, agreeing with the increased flapping frequency observed in zoological studies. In addition, we find that reduced membrane stiffness is associated with improved propulsive efficiency until the membrane flutters, but that incorporating microstructural anisotropy arising from biological fibre reinforcement enables a tenfold reduction of the flutter energy while maintaining high aerodynamic efficiency. Our results indicate that animals with specialized flapping motions may have correspondingly specialized flapping speeds, in contrast to arguments for a universally efficient Strouhal range. Additionally, our study demonstrates the significant role that the microstructural constitutive properties of the membrane wing of a bat can have in its propulsive performance.

Indexed as

ChiropteraAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFlight, AnimalModels, BiologicalWings, Animalbat flightfibresfluid–structuremembranesimulations

Identifiers

PMID37963557
PMCPMC10645508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.