Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37963437›Full record

Trial reportESC heart failure2024

Ivabradine could not decrease mitral regurgitation triggered atrial fibrosis and fibrillation compared with carvedilol.

Wei-Chieh Lee, Yu-Wen Lin, Jhih-Yuan Shih, Zhih-Cherng Chen, Nan-Chun Wu, Wei-Ting Chang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei-Chieh LeeSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-6134
Yu-Wen LinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jhih-Yuan ShihSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Zhih-Cherng ChenSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Nan-Chun WuSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Wei-Ting ChangSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
National Sun Yat-sen University · TWChi Mei Medical Center · TW

Funding

Chi-Mei Medical CenterNational Health Research Institutes NHRI-EX111-11138SINational Science and Technology Council NSTC 109-2326-B-384 -001 -MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIvabradine, a medical treatment for heart failure (HF), reduces heart rate (HR) and prolongs diastolic perfusion time. It is frequently prescribed to patients with HF who have a suboptimal response or intolerance to beta-blockers. Degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) is a valvular heart disease often associated with the development of HF and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, studies comparing the effects of ivabradine and beta-blockers on MR are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the potential therapeutic effects of ivabradine and carvedilol on MR using a rat model. METHODS AND

resultsUsing a novel echo-guided mini-invasive surgery, MR was created in 12-weeks-old Sprague-Dawley rats. After 2 weeks, the rats were randomized to receive either ivabradine or carvedilol for 4 weeks. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and at two-week intervals. Following haemodynamic studies, postmortem tissues were analysed. Notably, the MR-induced myocardial dysfunction did not improve considerably after treatment with ivabradine or carvedilol. However, in haemodynamic studies, pharmacological therapies, particularly carvedilol, mitigated MR-induced chamber dilatation (end-systolic volume and end-diastolic volume; MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05) and decreased compliance (end-systolic pressure-volume relationship; MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05). Compared with ivabradine, a shorter duration (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05) and reduced inducibility (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol and MR vs. MR + Ivabradine; P < 0.05) of AF were observed in MR rats treated with carvedilol. Similarly, reduced cardiac fibrosis and apoptosis were observed in the MR rat model in the treatment groups, especially in those treated with carvedilol (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.01).

conclusionsAlthough both ivabradine and carvedilol, at least in part, mitigated MR-induced chamber dilatation and decreased compliance, carvedilol had a better effect on reversing MR-induced cardiac fibrosis, apoptosis, and arrhythmogenesis than ivabradine. When compared with Ivabradine, MR rats treated with carvedilol exhibited a shorter duration and reduced inducibility of AF, thus providing more effective suppression of HCN4. Further investigations are required to validate our findings.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationHeart FailureMitral Valve InsufficiencyAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnimalsCarvedilolFibrosisHumansIvabradineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCarvedilolIvabradineApoptosisAtrial fibrillationCarvedilolIvabradineMitral regurgitation

Identifiers

PMID37963437
PMCPMC10804175
OpenAlexW4388661554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.