Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37963310›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2023

Using Machine Learning to Leverage Biomarker Change and Predict Colorectal Cancer Recurrence.

Patricia J Rodriguez, Patrick J Heagerty, Samantha Clark, Sara Khor, Yilin Chen, Eric Haupt, Erin E Hahn, Veena Shankaran, Aasthaa Bansal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Predicting liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients using routine biochemical tests enhanced by machine learning.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia J RodriguezThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0003-3026-2450
Patrick J HeagertyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-3403-6007
Samantha ClarkThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-1358
Sara KhorThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0003-0157-528X
Yilin ChenThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0003-0040-3881
Eric HauptDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-2801
Erin E HahnDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-8419-2331
Veena ShankaranFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0001-8136-6140
Aasthaa BansalThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0001-5507-2640
University of Washington · USKaiser Permanente · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Personalized Risk-AdaptIve Surveillance strategies in cancEr -- PRAISER37CA218413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BANSAL, AASTHAA · 2018 to 2024
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCI NIH HHS R37 CA218413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence after primary treatment varies across individuals and over time. Using patients' most up-to-date information, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) biomarker profiles, to predict risk could improve personalized decision making.

methodsWe used electronic health record data from an integrated health system on a cohort of patients diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I-III CRC between 2008 and 2013 (N = 3,970) and monitored until recurrence or end of follow-up. We addressed missingness in recurrence outcomes and longitudinal CEA measures, and engineered CEA features using current and past biomarker values for inclusion in a risk prediction model. We used a discrete time Superlearner model to evaluate various algorithms for predicting recurrence. We evaluated the time-varying discrimination and calibration of the algorithms and assessed the role of individual predictors.

resultsRecurrence was documented in 448 (11.3%) patients. XGBoost with depth = 1 (XGB-D1) predicted recurrence substantially better than all other algorithms at all time points, with AUC ranging from 0.87 (95% CI, 0.86 to 0.88) at 6 months to 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92 to 0.96) at 54 months. The only variable used by XGB-D1 was 6-month change in log CEA. Predicted 1-year risk of recurrence was nearly zero for patients whose log CEA did not increase in the last 6 months, between 12.2% and 34.1% for patients whose log CEA increased between 0.10 and 0.40, and 43.6% for those with a log CEA increase >0.40. Compared with XGB, penalized regression approaches (lasso, ridge, and elastic net) performed poorly, with AUCs ranging from 0.58 to 0.69.

conclusionA flexible, machine learning approach that incorporated longitudinal CEA information yielded a simple and high-performing model for predicting recurrence on the basis of 6-month change in log CEA.

Indexed as

Carcinoembryonic AntigenColorectal NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTime FactorsCarcinoembryonic Antigen

Identifiers

PMID37963310
PMCPMC10681492
OpenAlexW4388662556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.